14 December 2011
 
Walpole Planning Board Defers Jiffy Mart Approval, Tables Height Restrictions
Post a comment (login required)
Ed. Note: Here is the story written after last night's Planning Board meeting that appears in this morning's Eagle Times. Following the story are some notes from the meeting that could not fit in the story. CCB

Walpole Planning Board Defers Jiffy Mart Approval, Tables Height Restrictions

by Chuck Bingaman, Contributing Writer

Walpole’s Planning Board Tuesday evening recommended that the Zoning Board approve a special exception for Champlain Oil’s extending its proposed gas station/convenience project into the agricultural district west of Rt. 12 but deferred approval of the full site plan application for possible design adjustments before the January meeting.  

In addition, the Board tabled three warrant articles related to possible height restrictions on new construction in the commercial district and decided instead to consider more nuanced plans including planned unit developments in future revisions of the zoning ordinance and master plan.

                 Jiffy Mart Pushed to January

Bryan Cairns, vice-president of Champlain Oil opened the hearing by reciting several ways the company had tweaked its site proposal for safety and aesthetic purposes based on Planning Board comments and questions from October.

*  the diesel fuel tank had been pulled in under the parking lot surface and the single large storm water filtration pool had been broken into two pools, thus keeping the fuel farther from the storm water
*  vegetative filter strips had been added to both sides of the property to further prevent spills from getting into the soil and aquifer underneath
*  trees had been added to the plan on the north side of the lot to block it from view of houses to the north.

Cairns answered many Board and audience questions about safety procedures to prevent fuel from spilling and entering the aquifer. While he recited many design and procedural features to prevent fuel spills and to deal with them if they occur, many in the audience and some on the Board seemed skeptical.  “There’s always a way an accident can happen,” noted audience member Max Imhoff.

Despite the audience’s and some Board members’ remaining concerns, a motion to hire a third-party expert to take another look at the plan for possible safety improvements failed. Rather, a motion to table the plan until January--with the understanding that it was generally approved but for a few minor design items to be considered such as the town design standards for the building--was passed 4-3 with chairman Jeff Miller casting a deciding vote.

Proposed Commercial District Height Limit Articles

Board member Ben Daviss outlined the Board’s proposed height limits of 35 feet or three stories for new construction in the commercial district and its thinking behind them. He noted that other towns have such limits and that the most recent survey of town voters showed that their primary concern was the maintenance of a rural atmosphere and look and the prevention of commercial sprawl.

Walpole resident Jed Pellerin, also an architect and principal in Avanru Development, argued that a specific height restriction, particularly one as low as 35 feet, would likely have the opposite effect and encourage strip mall development where developers could not build up.  Rather, he suggested that a better way to preserve open space and to encourage less sprawl would be to allow buildings in the commercial zone of four or five stories that could have retail space on the ground floor and office space and housing on higher floors.

Rob Kasper, also an Avanru principal, suggested that the board instead consider including “planned unit development” possibilities in the zoning ordinance that would enable developers and town planners to have more flexibility in achieving their goals while avoiding strip mall development.

The Board decided--by unanimous vote--to table the warrant article proposal on specific height limitations and to look into the planned unit development concept.

Notes: Proposed store hours for the Jiffy Mart convenience store/gas station/fast food outlet are 5:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m....The measured water table under the proposed store appears to be about 15 feet below the surface....Any spills of 3 gallons or more of fuel have to be reported to state authorities; of Champlain Oil's 150 stations in Vermont and New Hampshire, none has reported a spill in the past 9 months according to VP Cairns....Cairns explained the Vermont imposition of a $20,000 civil penalty on Champlain in August as a failure of employees to "push a 'print' button to run out required reports."....The town aquifer over which the project would be built supplies about 15% of the town's water at this time....Champlain Oil did NOT consult the town's design guidelines in planning its building but promised to do so before the January meeting....While Champlain asked the NH DOT for two entrance/exits from the space, it will be limited to a single 36 foot entrance/exit.

Posted by Chuck Bingaman at 10:34 AM | Comments (4)
 
Subscription Options

You are not logged in, so your subscription status for this entry is unknown. You can login or register here.

Re: Walpole Planning Board Defers Jiffy Mart Approval, Tables Height Restrictions
I have to agree with Avanru's "anti-strip mall logic." A handsome 5 story building with green around would be nicer than 5 single story retail outlets along the lines of the Dollar Store. I'm not sure Walpole needs or can maintain an entirely rural atmosphere along rte 12. Let's just not let it turn into a Nashua 101a kind of place... sprawl at its worst! Perhaps an analysis of what they did "wrong" 20 years ago would help Walpole avoid that overly commercialized fate.

Posted by btshriver on December 19, 2011 at 7:46 AM

Re: Walpole Planning Board Defers Jiffy Mart Approval, Tables Height Restrictions
Please show me a handsome 5 story building anywhere in Walpole. Rte 12 is already becoming "a Nashua 101a kind of place"....an analysis of what "they" did wrong 20 years ago would yield you a picture of what Walpole is allowing now.

Posted by cathywhite on December 19, 2011 at 4:34 PM

Re: Walpole Planning Board Defers Jiffy Mart Approval, Tables Height Restrictions
We don't have any 5 story buildings but maybe we should if it helps us avoid retail induced sprawl. The Congregational Church isn't 5 stories tall but it's as tall as one. Shall we knock down the steeple? ;-) I think we're a long way from "Nashua 101a" today but recognize we're headed in that direction. I still think that responsible, local, well integrated development efforts like the one Avanru proposes are our best hedge against becoming "over-retailed" along 12.

Posted by btshriver on January 4, 2012 at 12:00 PM

Re: Walpole Planning Board Defers Jiffy Mart Approval, Tables Height Restrictions
With all due respect to "btshriver", perhaps Walpole is in it's current imbroglio because we have never had a Master Plan with teeth that prohibits or restricts "retail induced sprawl". Of COURSE a church steeple is equal to or more than a 5-story building, and should NOT be knocked down!!!!! That's just silly - but these "developers" aren't building churches with steeples, and are not in the game to make the town better, as they are so fond of claiming...they are in it to make money. I have pictures of a Family Dollar building in Poland, ME that is actually lovely in appearance for what it is (looks kind of like the Walpole Savings Bank or Real to Reel @ No.Meadow Plaza)- these photos were passed around at a PB work session ages ago by my husband. Why couldn't the town stand firm and demand that Family Dollar build one in Walpole that looks like that one instead of the eyesore we are stuck with? And please, bear in mind that Avanru IS the main developer of land on Rte. 12 (condos, co-op, retail/fast food/offices, etc.) all shoehorned onto a parcel of land that technically meets town requirements. Our best hedge against becoming over-retailed is to let the land remain agricultural. I don't think that very many people think we are headed in Nashua's direction, but they should.

Posted by cathywhite on January 4, 2012 at 5:05 PM

Post a comment (login required)