16 June 2010
 
Tractor Supply: The Cost of Development, The Loss of Agricultural Heritage
Post a comment (login required)
Editor's Note: The following is a comment from Walpole resident Barbra Bragg about the recent destruction by developers of the new Tractor Supply store of the old barn on their lot and, ironically, their naming the road off Rt. 12 "Red Barn Lane."  Perhaps they should have named it "No Red Barn Lane."  The Walpolean welcomes comments from registered readers and asks that all commentators stand behind their comments by signing their names.  CCB

"Historic barns and agricultural structures symbolize the distinctive New Hampshire values of heritage, hard work, productivity and stewardship.  They are witnesses to the role of agriculture in our state's image and its economy, and they serve as scenic landmarks for residents and visitors alike."

                                                                                                                  New Hampshire  RSA  227-C:27,  1999

 

    "Red Barn Lane" signage has just been installed along Route 12 at the entrance to the new Tractor Supply Company's building site.

 

     There is NO barn there!  No barn on Red Barn Lane?  The red barn was destroyed, crushed into dumpsters and carted off to a landfill 

somewhere.

 

     First let me say: I have nothing against thoughtful development in our community, but only development that takes the entire environmental

impact on the community seriously should be acceptable.  Environmental 

impacts include scenic and historic, as well as, any and all 

ecological changes.

 

     Where was the Historic Society?  The Conservation Committee?  The 

Planning Board?  Or our State Representative, who heads the 

Agriculture and Environmental Committee?  Didn't the developers tell 

you that they planned to destroy the Barn?

 

     The Red Barn was a beautiful building that should have been saved.  

There were families eager to have it moved on to their own property.  

It is Walpole's loss.

 

     Sure, it wasn't the biggest barn around or the most historic . . . but 

our State is losing a large number of farm buildings every year.  

There is State money to protect New Hampshire's barns.

 

     Walpole will continue to face development  challenges, but the Town 

needs to be much, much more careful in regulating what goes up and 

what comes down.

 

Respectfully,

Barbra Bragg


Posted by Chuck Bingaman at 4:12 PM | Comments (5)
 
Subscription Options

You are not logged in, so your subscription status for this entry is unknown. You can login or register here.

Re: Tractor Supply: The Cost of Development, The Loss of Agricultural Heritage
As a new alternate member to the planning board I am discouraged by the lack of involvement of the residents in our town’s development. Meeting agendas, public hearings and minutes of the meetings are all publicly posted, yet a very small number of residents come to the meetings to voice concerns or provide input. In July the planning board will be holding a public hearing on the Land Use Section of the Master Plan. I encourage residents to come to the meeting and have a voice in the process and perhaps barns like the one that was just torn down can be preserved. Steve Dalessio

Posted by sdalessi on June 16, 2010 at 5:15 PM

Re: Tractor Supply: The Cost of Development, The Loss of Agricultural Heritage
Barbara's frustration is shared. However, the land that the Tractor Supply developer bought was zoned as commercial land and has been for many years. All the land on that side of Route 12 from North Meadow Plaza to the Cold River is zoned commercial, even though the soil there has been rated by the state's agricultural department as some of the best soil in the state. Some support the zoning as a way to strengthen Walpole's tax base and bring the town needed retail services; others oppose the zoning as a portal to the loss of farmland and heritage. If the town wants to rezone that stretch of land, this is something that can be brought to the town meeting for a discussion and vote. But, until that land is rezoned as something other than commercial, anyone will have the right to build a commercial building on it. Town agencies don't have the legal right to tell a landowner that he can't tear down his barn or build a commercial building on land that's zoned commercial. This isn't a matter of lax regulation but of people's right to do with their property what zoning ordinances allow. Whether the zoning law advances or hinders the wishes of the town as expressed in the master plan is a different question -- one that I hope the planning board will address before long. -- Ben Daviss

Posted by bend on June 16, 2010 at 7:22 PM

Re: Tractor Supply: The Cost of Development, The Loss of Agricultural Heritage
I couldn't agree more with Barbra Bragg. Granted, "landowners" will do what ordinances allow, and sometimes much more. Someday the Master Plan may become more than a set of guidelines for the community. It is critical that townspeople become a part of the decision making process; especially considering the even larger development that is in the works at the Tractor Supply location. Everyone needs to attend Planning Board meetings, most importantly during the summer "doldrums". The Planning Board meets at 7 P.M. on the second Tuesday of every month in the Walpole Town Hall. Jeff White

Posted by cathywhite on June 17, 2010 at 7:33 PM

Re: Tractor Supply: The Cost of Development, The Loss of Agricultural Heritage
There is an old saying that goes something like this: It does no good to lock the barn door after the horse has been stolen! The time for concern about saving historic buildings is prior to being torn down. Ben Daviss is right when he says the time to state ones concerns is at the meetings. Unfortunately some of us have to work the night of the Planning Board meetings. I would guess that the owners of the land at Tractor Supply construction site would have gladly let someone move the building, at that persons expense, if done in a timely manner. Keep watch here on the Walpolean for upcoming events you have concerns about. Chuck Bingaman does a great job of keeping the Town informed. If you can't make a meeting, write a letter. Complaints before the fact have credence, not afterwards! Bill Moses

Posted by william on June 18, 2010 at 11:06 AM

Re: Tractor Supply: The Cost of Development, The Loss of Agricultural Heritage
Everyone wants to complain about what landowners do on their own property. What right do YOU have to complain? Do YOU own that property? Would the changes made on that property be harmful to you or any neighbors? No. I am sure I could drive by each and every one's property and complain about something that the property owner has done. It is foolishness.

Be thankful that a company is coming into our town to provide employment and taxes. Be thankful that you OWN property and that as a property owner YOU have rights. It won't be long before the property owner has no rights at all, and the town decides what the property owner can and cannot do. Stop complaining and enjoy the growth that will help the town grow and flourish. Todd Patch

Posted by todd p on June 22, 2010 at 2:44 PM

Post a comment (login required)