22 March 2010
 
Road Agent Terrell Responds to Town Meeting Truck Purchase Rejection
Post a comment (login required)
Ed. Note:  At the March 13 Town Meeting, Walpole voters rejected a warrant article proposing to purchase a 6-wheel dump truck with snow plowing equipment costing over $158,000. That price would have been offset by $8,500 in trade-in value for an old truck and $22,000 to be taken out a capital equipment reserve fund, leaving $127,998 to be funded by general taxation. The Selectmen reported that they had gotten one quote on the truck before signing a contract contingent on the voters' passing the warrant article. Carl Wistreich, a Walpole property owner and owner of L&B Trucks in Westminster, VT, spoke at the meeting and objected to the decision process. After considerable discussion, the warrant article was turned down. The following letter is Road Agent Jim Terrell's explanation of the situation.  CCB



To whom it may concern,

    In response to the articles on Walpole’s Town Meeting.

   Since well before I became Road Agent in 2002 The Town of Walpole has bought equipment on quotes – not by a formal bid process. If the townspeople want to go to a formal bid process the Selectboard or myself have no problem with that.

   In the fall of 2008 I sought quotes (not bids) on a new truck from International and Freightliner to be put in an article in the 2009 town meeting. A quote was never received from L&B Freightliner. It was later decided by the Selectboard to withhold an article for a truck that year because of the economic environment.

  L&B Freightliner was given specifications for a truck to be put in for at the 2010 town meeting. They did not give me a quote until two weeks before town meeting and long after the public budget hearing where the public could have questioned any article or budget matters before they went to print. Even then the quote from L&B Freightliner did not meet the specifications that were asked for. (ie. – a smaller motor with less power and torque, no transmission retarder, 23,000 lb. rear axel instead of a 30,000 lb. rear axel, smaller fuel tank and smaller tires among many other items. ) To this day the only written quote that I was given by L&B is $34,000 more than the quote from International. The lesser quote from L&B was only by word of mouth after the price was questioned. If this had been a formal bid process L&B’s bid would have been rejected as soon as it was opened.

   The truck from International that was rejected at town meeting is virtually the same as two previous trucks that the town voted in 2006 and 2008. This model truck works well for our requirement, is not out of line for town trucks in New England and would help standardize our fleet.

   The truck that we sought to replace cost the town a lot of money in repairs last year and lost trade in value. This years repair bill will probably be higher because we put off some repairs in anticipation of replacing the truck this summer.

    I would like to suggest that anyone that is interested in purchasing policies or the budget join in the process instead of joining a free for all at town meeting fueled by disgruntled business owners who didn’t do their homework. There were only two residents at the public budget hearing this year other than town employees and elected officials. No one from truck dealerships was present. This would have been the place to question and air concerns. This was the time something constructive could have been done. But no one was there.

     To me the biggest loser from this situation was the townspeople – for many reasons.

                                                                                       Jim Terrell

 

                                                                                       Walpole Road Agent


Posted by Chuck Bingaman at 1:43 PM | Comments (1)
 
Subscription Options

You are not logged in, so your subscription status for this entry is unknown. You can login or register here.

Re: Road Agent Terrell Responds to Town Meeting Truck Purchase Rejection
Mr.Terrell is absolutely correct in stating that budget is the best time to question and discuss warrant articles. It is rare that more than two or three individuals show up and usually they do not ask all the questions that probably should be answered. The reason more people are pushing for SB2 is because of the length of Town Meetings, drawn out by questioning and bickering that could have been taken care of during the Budget Hearing! Having been in on similar situations I know that you can requests bids or quotes and sometimes only receive one prior to the deadline that was set and then receive complaints from others who were not selected through no ones fault but there own. Jim is telling it like it is! Bill Moses

Posted by william on March 22, 2010 at 6:26 PM

Post a comment (login required)