9 July 2008
 
Percentage of Walpole Land in Conservation
Post a comment (login required)
Ed. Note: In answer to a Walpolean comment/question this morning concerning the percentage of land in Walpole currently under some conservation restriction, here are two paragraphs from a story I am reporting.  Note that the Conservation Commission proposal for setting as a town goal the eventual setting aside of 25% of land for conservation is simply a recommendation for the Planning Board to consider in its updating of the town's Master Plan. The Society for the Preservation of NH Forests reports that 22% of New Hampshire is currently in conservation and 51 of the state's 234 municipalities have more than 25% of their land in conservation. (I also understand that New York City has 27% if its land in conservation, mostly in parks, etc..) Note also that Marcia Galloway is the chair of the Conservation Commission, and she would be glad to discuss this issue with you. CCB

In a related development, at the July 8 Walpole Planning Board meeting, [Mel]Schupack handed out a summary of Walpole land holdings showing that 3,264 acres or 13.7% of the town’s acreage is currently held in conservation preventing it from being developed.  Of that conserved land, 912 acres or 27.9% are owned by the town, 278 acres or 8.5% are owned by the state, 164 acres or 5% are owned by the Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests, and 1910 acres or 58.5% are owned privately but under conservation easement.

        Schupack alluded to the Conservation Commission’s recent—and somewhat controversial—suggestion that the town set a goal of getting 25% of its land into conservation.  That goal was drawn from recommendations of the Society for the Preservation of New Hampshire Forests that argues that a “green infrastructure” is vital for human health, the rural economy, and community quality of life. The purpose of such a goal would be to assist the community in securing open lands close to home, to meet the town’s citizens’ needs for the future.  Specifically such “smart conservation”, as the SFPNHF calls it, is integrated with smart growth to provide such vital assets to towns as clean drinking water, village and town parks and outdoor recreation fields, locally produced food, town forests and wildlife habitat, and lands with scenic beauty and community character.
Posted by Chuck Bingaman at 11:05 AM | Comments (0)
 
Subscription Options

You are not logged in, so your subscription status for this entry is unknown. You can login or register here.

No comments found.

Post a comment (login required)