13 December 2007
 
Walpole Developers Failing to Meet Planning Board Conditions
Post a comment (login required)
Ed. Note: Here is a story appearing in this morning's Eagle Times.  CCB
 

12-12-07 

Walpole Developers Failing to Meet Subdivision Conditions

By Chuck Bingaman, Contributing Writer

            Fred Dill and Randy Daniels, doing business as Walpole D&D LLC, have not fulfilled Planning Board conditions for approving a residential subdivision they revealed at a Walpole Planning Board meeting Tuesday evening.

            Beginning with a public hearing on May 8 and continuing through several additional hearings, Dill and Daniels persuaded the Walpole Planning Board to grant approval—with conditions—to their proposed 8 lot major subdivision off Hooper Road between Old Keene and Wentworth Roads.  

            Those conditions, included in a confirming letter sent to Dill and Daniels September 19, instructed them to “submit a plan [for upgrading Hooper Road] approved by the road agent as previously agreed to, [and to] post a performance bond based on road agent’s specifications to insure completion and compliance with the Town’s standards for a Class V road”.  In addition, the Board required Dill and Daniels to submit a proposed storm water drainage plan and other conditions.

            On November 16 the Planning Board sent Dill and Daniels a letter telling them that it had discussed the status of the subdivision at its November 13 meeting and requesting them to “meet the conditions of the approval granted 9/11/07 prior to beginning any work on the project.”  The Board’s November 16 letter also warned dill and Daniels that their “proposal is in danger of becoming permanently invalid or denied if you do not meet the conditions placed on it immediately and to the satisfaction of the Board.”

            Instead of complying with the Planning Board’s conditions, Dill and Daniels went around the Planning Board to the Selectmen to seek a waiver of the performance bond required by the Planning Board, authorized reconstruction work on Hooper Road after conversations with the road agent instead of submitting a proposed plan to the Planning Board, and did not submit a storm water drainage plan. 

            At Tuesday’s meeting of the Planning Board, Dill said that he had met with road agent Jim Terrell three or four times regarding proposed road improvements.  He also said he “signed an oral agreement” with Terrell and thought he had sent a copy of it to Board secretary Pam Aslinger.  Dill also announced, to the evident surprise of the Board, that the road work had already been completed subject to a review in the spring for any additional needed improvements disclosed by winter freezes and thaws.  Neither Aslinger nor Board Chair Jeff Miller had received such a letter of agreement or a proposal for the road improvement plan. 

            “We wanted a plan for the road design and we haven’t seen one,” noted a clearly frustrated Chairman Miller.  “If you don’t want to submit plans, we don’t need to approve your sub-division.  And we haven’t seen any plans.”

            Dill conceded, “The road is done” and added “we thought we were sticking our necks out” in doing so.

            Dill also conceded that D&D had not submitted a storm water drainage plan, explaining that omission by saying that they had made no changes and had no plans for changing storm water drainage.  Chairman Miller told Dill “you went around the conditions, you did not communicate with the Board as you were obligated to.  This raises precedents for the future. It’s important that people realize that, when the Planning Board imposes conditions, you have to follow them.”

            With respect to seeking a waiver of the performance bond that D&D had agreed to provide, Miller noted “we are still in charge of performance bonds—not the Selectmen.  You went around our conditions that you agreed to by not posting the performance bond, by doing road construction without getting Board approval of your plan, and by not submitting a proposed drainage plan.”

            By yesterday Planning Board members, frustrated with Dill’s and Daniel’s non-compliance with agreed conditions, were investigating options for enforcing the conditions on D&D’s sub-division approval. Further actions are expected.

                                    --30--

 

           

 

           


Posted by Chuck Bingaman at 6:26 PM | Comments (4)
 
Subscription Options

You are not logged in, so your subscription status for this entry is unknown. You can login or register here.

Re: Walpole Developers Failing to Meet Planning Board Conditions
It's no surprise to me that either of these "gentlemen" (and I use the term loosely, since so few developers are) feel free to play fast and loose with the Planning Board's mandates. I live in a Daniels development myself, and know how he operates; said development also happens to abut commercial property of Mr. Dill's that has been developed and operated with no regard to wetlands, wildlife habit, or human neighbors. But what I really, really am dying to know, is how Mr. Dill and Mr. Terrell "signed an oral agreement". The logistics of that idea are truly scary!

Posted by cathywhite on December 14, 2007 at 7:56 AM

Re: Walpole Developers Failing to Meet Planning Board Conditions
Good Point, Cathy! Maybe it was a frosty morning and they could see their breaths and they signed the frozen air! One other concern I wonder if anyone has approached as regards to the development affecting the water table: what happens when they have to "BLAST" to remove some ledge that runs through the property. Blasting will alter the water flow that is supplying people's wells!!!! Hmmmmm. Bill M.

Posted by bill on December 14, 2007 at 3:18 PM

Re: Walpole Developers Failing to Meet Planning Board Conditions
D&D broke their agreement with the Planning Board to submit a storm water drainage plan, and the approval of their subdivision should be revoked by the Planning Board because of this. The whole point of the agreement was to protect the neighbors with property abutting the sub division. This blatant disregard for both the authority of the Planning Board and the rights of the abutters should not be tolerated. It indicates that there will only be worse things to follow, and obviously they will be done in back room deals behind the backs of both the Planning Board and the other citizens of the town of Walpole. Why is there any hesitation at all to stop this sort of piracy? D&D do not care at all about the people of Walpole. That is obvious. Don't let them break their agreements with impunity basically throwing all the hard work of the Planning Board back in their faces.

Posted by ssteisel on December 17, 2007 at 6:53 PM

Re: Walpole Developers Failing to Meet Planning Board Conditions
I could not agree more with the above comment! Why ARE developers continually allowed to ride roughshod over the people of this town? ( And curiously, why is there not any kind of organization of concerned abutters? If the fate of our water was at stake, my husband and I would be going door-to-door and confering with every one of our neighbors.) Bill, you might want to go back into the Walpolean's archives for info from the hydrologist's report regarding the potential effects of blasting on the water table - I think it is addressed there, but sorry, I don't know which meeting offhand. Also, I did not note in the PB minutes whether or not Mr. Dill recused himself as an alternate during all this D&D discussion, as would have been appropriate. Boy, this was one meeting I was sorry to have missed.

Posted by cathywhite on December 18, 2007 at 3:38 PM

Post a comment (login required)