Ed. Note: Walpolean Barbara Schupack sends the following information. CCB


SAXTONS RIVER ART GUILD CALL TO ARTISTS:

Saxtons River Art Guild invites all area artists, members as well as non-members, to exhibit at an “Autumn Art Festival and Sale” on the first floor of the Walpole Town Hall on Sat., Oct. 6 & Sun., Oct. 7, FROM 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM.  Artists are encouraged to display their original framed art work as well as unframed, matted paintings, quality prints, note cards and other such items derived from their art.  No commissions will be taken.  There will be a registration fee of $20 for S.R.A.G. members and $25 for non-members, mainly to cover the cost of advertising.
 
Five large panels, (5' wide 5 1/2 ' tall) each of which could provide space for two artists to display their work have been loaned to us by the Walpole Artisans Tour group.  They will be available on a first-come, first-serve basis.  Those who have free-standing panels of their own are encouraged to use them.  The amount of space available for each display will depend upon the total number of artists registering.  Registrations will close on Sept. 20th.
 
Registration forms will be available at the S.R.A.G. Annual Meeting on Sept. 12 or may be obtained anytime by calling Barbara Schupack, Festival Chairperson, at 603-756-9389.  Also look for them at all area art supply and frame shops.  Please call Barbara also with any questions or for further details.
Nan Durling, Publicity 603-445-5070.

Ed. Note: Thanks to Planning Board Secretary Pam ("A" as in Ace) Aslinger, here are the minutes from the lengthy and important August 14 Planning Board meeting.  CCB

Town of Walpole

                                PLANNING BOARD MEETING                              

August 14, 2007  7:30pm Town Hall

MINUTES

Presiding:  Jeff Miller, Ch.

Members Present:  Eric Merklein, Dave DeCoste, Bob Miller, V-Ch., Henry Fletcher, Selectman Charles Miller.  Jeff White, alt., Fred Dill present but recused and in audience.

Members Absent:  Ben Daviss, Shane O’Keefe, alt.  Recording:  Pamela Aslinger, Sec./alt.

These minutes are unapproved and will be reviewed at the September 11, 2007 meeting for errors, omissions, and corrections.  There were over 50 persons in attendance.

I.            Meeting opened at 7:40pm.

            A.  Alternate Jeff White was appointed for Ben Daviss.

            B.  Minutes were passed over until 9/11/2007 meeting.

II.            Review applications submitted:  Accept/Reject/Delay

            In order to speed up the meeting, Ch. Miller announced he would like to accept all the applications as complete in one motion, provided the Secretary’s report was favorable on each.  Sec. Aslinger reported all applications were complete with fees, abutter lists, maps, all notices posted, abutters notified.  No application had pending issues.  The applications were:

A.  UNH Sprint-Nextel Corp. Site Plan Review

B.  Hubbard Farms LLC Minor 2 lot subdivision

C.  Martha Kingsbury Minor 2 lot subdivision

D.  Sheldon Sawyer Minor 4 lot subdivision

E.  Flessa, Laroche/Pratt Minor 2 lot subdivision

F.  Richard S. Francis Minor 2 lot subdivision

A motion to accept applications A-F as complete was made and seconded.  Motion carried unanimously.  Ch. Miller said the public hearing for each application would be held separately, with the Board taking action on each after the public hearing was closed

III.            Meeting was closed the public hearing opened for:

            A.  UNH Sprint-Nextel Corp. - Site Plan Review for additional antennas to existing telecommunications facility located at 88 Scovill Road Map 3 Lot 82 in the Timberland zone.  Jacqueline Murray of C. Davis Associates stated the purpose of the site plan is to add 2 new antennas at the same centerline heights of 280 ft. and one equipment cabinet inside the existing equipment shelter.  She and the Board reviewed the maps.  She said there would be no other changes.  Ch. Miller called for questions.  Charles Miller asked if there would be a new building for the equipment.  Answer was no.  She said UNH owns the land.  Mr. Merklein asked to be shown the existing 6 antennas and where the placement of the two new ones would be, Ms. Murray showed him on the maps.  Charles Miller asked if they would be installing anything on the Fall Mountain site, she said no this was unrelated.  Mr. Merklein asked about CMZH, Ms. Murray said it was an acronym for the transmission technology being used.  Hearing no further comments Ch. Miller closed the public hearing and called for Board action.  Charles Miller asked why the maps said Walpole VT not NH.  Ms. Murray said it referred to a radius area used for internal identification.  Cindy Westover asked when she could speak (note, persons sitting in the back rows were unable to hear clearly) Ch. Miller said the hearing had been closed, but allowed her questions.  She asked if there were going to be additional towers, higher, wider?  Ms. Murray said the tower is owned by UNH they lease the space, no additional towers.  Charles Miller asked about sending the tax bill to Sprint-Nextel, Ms. Murray said she was not involved in the taxation issue.  Henry Fletcher made a motion, seconded by Bob Miller to approve the site plan as presented.  Motion carried unanimously.

Walpole Planning Board Minutes 8/14/07 page 2 

            B.  Hubbard Farms LLC - Minor 2 lot subdivision located on Rte. 12 North Map 12 Lot 4 in the Commercial and Rural Agricultural zones.  Joe DiBernardo presented the proposal whose purpose was to created Lot 1 of 31.13 acres and Lot 2 of 12.48 acres.  A 30 ft. ROW across Huntington Lane is being retained for Lot 1 access to back area.  Mr. DiBernardo presented revised (9/6) plans, Lot 1 of 32.06 acres and Lot 2 of 12.15 acres.  He said it is located in two zoning districts, with 250 ft. in front being commercial everything in the back Rural Ag.  He said the new plans show revised lot numbers to match the tax maps.  Lot 2 has the frontage requirements but is accessed via a 30 ft. ROW and then an existing 50 ft. ROW (Huntington Lane) that is part of Lot 1.  Members asked Mr. DiBernardo to point out the oddly configured lots on the map individually.  The property lines follow down the center of Huntington Lane.  Ch. Miller called for other questions.  Mr. Blount asked for a description of where the parcel is.  Mr. DiBernardo pointed out surrounding properties noting it was south of Pinnacle View and surrounding Diamond Pizza where the old Hubbard chicken barns where.

Barbara Dretzin asked if the zoning uses were being changed?  Ch. Miller said this was a simple subdivision of the land under the existing commercial and rural agricultural zones.  Mr. DiBernardo pointed out that Lot 1 did include all the commercial area and it was partially used as a boundary line.  He pointed out existing buildings designated to be removed or relocated.  Ch. Miller noted Chamberlain Machine was interested in Lot 2.  Hearing no other questions he closed the public hearing and called for Board action.  A motion to approve the proposal as presented was seconded, motion carried unanimously.  The maps and mylar were signed.  Mr. DiBernardo will record the mylar and report to the Secretary the cabinet and drawer number as proof.

            C.  Martha Kingsbury - Minor 2 lot subdivision located on Kingsbury Road, Map 8 Lot 118 in the Rural Agricultural zone.  Ms. Virginia Foote, of Lawrence Associates presented revised plans to the Board noting the proposal results in Lot 1 of 71.02 acres and Lot 1 of 1.11 acres.  The lots meet the frontages, size and setback requirements.  Ch. Miller called for questions or comments, hearing none he closed the public hearing and called for board action.  Jeff White made a motion to approve the proposal as presented, Dave DeCoste seconded, motion carried unanimously.  Ms. Foote agreed to record the mylar and report recording information to the Secretary as proof, the maps and mylar were signed.

            D.  Sheldon Sawyer - Minor 4 lot Subdivision located on County, Wentworth and Meetinghouse Roads, Map 5 Lot 4 in the Rural Agricultural zone.  Ms. Foote presented noting the purpose is to create Lot 1 of 5.62 acres, Lot 2 of 6.36 acres and Lot 3 of 5.02 acres and Lot 4 of 55.52 acres remaining.  Mr. Blount asked where the remaining 55.52 acres are, Ms. Foote showed on the insert where the remainder is.  Ch. Miller called for questions.  Nancy Houge asked for clarification of where she was in relation to the proposal.  Ch. Miller described to her satisfaction where she was in relation to the proposal.  He noted the frontage is on County Road but the ROW is off Wentworth Road just before the cornfield.  Ms. Steisel asked why the access was off of Wentworth not County.  Ch. Miller said Mr. Sawyer was allowed to give the ROW over his land for access, noting the steep terrain off of County Road.  A question was asked if the subdivision was for housing?  Answer was the lots met the requirements for housing.  Charles Miller asked if the ROW would serve all three new lots?  Mr. Sawyer said if the lots were sold or given away the ROW would be better determined, he said he had no immediate plans to sell the lots but was planning for the future.  Hearing no further questions, Ch. Miller closed the public hearing and called for Board action.  Henry Fletcher moved to approve the plan as presented, seconded by Eric Merklein, motion carried unanimously.  The maps and mylar were signed, Ms. Foote agreed to record the mylar and report recording information to the Secretary as proof.

            E.  Steven Flessa, Barbara Laroche/John McKee Pratt Revocable Trust - Minor 2 lot subdivision  Mr. located on Reservoir Road, Map 11, Lot 1 in the Rural Agricultural zone.

Walpole Planning Board Minutes 8/14/07 page 3

DiBernardo presented noting the proposal results in Lot 1 of 41.51 acres and Lot 2 41.83 acres, the lots meet the frontage requirements and lot sizes.  Charles Miller asked if Mr. Pratt’s house was on any of the new lots.  The lots are at the end of the road and north of the reservoir with Mr. Pratts house on the opposite side of the road.  Ch. Miller called for further questions, being none, closed the public hearing and called for Board action.  Mr. Merklein made a motion to approve the proposal as presented, seconded by Henry Fletcher, motion carried unanimously.  Maps and mylar were signed, Mr. DiBernardo agreed to record the mylar and report recording information to the Secretary as proof.

            F.  Richard S. Francis III - Minor 2 lot subdivision located on Ramsay Hill Rd. in the Rural Agricultural zone, Map 11, Lot 7-1-1.  Mr. DiBernardo presented noting the proposal results in Lot 1 of 57 acres and Lot 2 of 3.1 acres.  He said test pits have been done.  Ted Fellows is handling the State subdivision application.  Ch. Miller called for questions.  Sue Bingaman asked if the small lot was where he was building his new house, answer was no, he is building on the larger lot.  Charles Miller asked about a Hatfield view easement.  Mr. DiBernardo said it was an easement granted to Ms. Hatfield to protect her view.  Hearing no further comments, Ch. Miller called for Board action.  Ms. Aslinger noted a condition of approval would be to obtain State subdivision approval prior to recording.  Ch. Miller called for a motion to approve the proposal with the condition State subdivision is granted.  Motion was seconded and carried unanimously.  Maps and mylar were signed, with Mr. DiBernardo agreeing to record the mylar, once the state subdivision approval was granted.  A copy of the approval will be forwarded to the Planning Board, the mylar can then be recorded, Mr. DiBernardo will contact the Secretary with the recording information as proof.

V.            Unfinished Business

            A.  1834 “Griswold Place” - Site Plan Review pending revision.  Mr. Smith was not available, Mr. John Blair presented.  He noted in order to satisfy the abutters Mr. and Mrs. Fred Ernst, the building in the back would be moved 5 feet from the property line with the basement area and actual foundation area to be removed and relocated.  He said windows are to be removed from the west side rear, less two and reducing the size, the center section will have four windows removed as well.  Sec. Aslinger read a letter from Mr. Ernst describing their agreement after a meeting held on 7/25th with Mr. Smith and the architect.  The letter confirmed the changes described above and is on size.  Ch. Miller asked the Board to approve the revisions as requested.  A motion to approve the revisions was made by Mr. DeCoste, seconded, motion carried unanimously.  The newly revised plans will be filed as approved.

            B.  Walpole D & D, LLC - Major 8 lot subdivision - Review water study, Brian Goetz presented.  Mr. Goetz provided a power point presentation following the written study. (A copy of the written study is available for review in the Selectmen’s Office during regular business hours.)

Ch. Miller recognized Mr. Goetz of Weston Sampson in Portsmouth.  He said he was hired to do a desktop analysis using the existing data to determine the hydro-geological conditions and water balance of the area to determine the projected water demands and to query the abutting properties to gather additional data regarding wells, water use and other pertinent information and to determine the need for conservation measures and deed restrictions for future and other site recommendations.  He pointed to USGS maps within the study showing conditions from the 1930’s and 50’s.  He said they met with DES hydro-geologist discussing the geology of the area, saying everything around the areas surface is less than 2 meters thick till overlying bedrock.  He said the DiBernardo plans show the test pits, noting the same conditions apply.  He said NHGRANIT on-line showed soil paths, confirmation of the rock and till.  He showed a bedrock map, Littleton, Fitch.  He moved to a lineament map showing the actual fractures where water is present, it is an aerial map.  He pointed out where the roads were as reference.  He said based on the above information, they determined the recharge rate, according to a recent USGS 2004 report

Walpole Planning Board Minutes 8/14/07 page 4

in Vermont and NH, the recharge rate is 20% for precipitation or 7” of rainfall will actually penetrate and recharge the aquafirs.  With that rate at 43 acres, each acre has a little over 200,000 gallons per year recharging, the caveat is once you get to the bedrock it is a bit less, the existing slope on the property effects the recharge.  NHGRANIT has information on the sites land use, he and Mr. Dill walked the land before the meeting, noting the data was accurate.  He noted the type of trees on the land/site, the hayfield, barns and wetlands.  He said they took the USGS maps and reviewed the concerns of the abutters and the effect of drainage on the site.  He pointed out where the drainage moves, the major part of the subdivision drains on the southerly portion.  He said they looked at the large drainage area of 22 acres and taking the worst case storm event, 2.8” per day, a magnitude flow rate of would be 76,000 gallons per hour.  He said the next step was to incorporate the 23 returned abutter surveys and their information.  They were able to locate each of them on a tax map, and he reviewed each in the report, see report.  He said they gave a good overview of the types and yields of the wells.  Some wells were hydro-fractured, drilled, dug or pounded.  The surveys provided a cross section of ages of wells, with an overall drop in yields over the past 10 years.  He cautioned the numbers were not scientifically calculated but a good indicator.  He discussed the depth of wells and static.  He noticed the newer wells provide highest yield, this is not unusual, the older wells do not recharge as quickly.  One 100 year old dug well provides 10 gallons/minute.  He said one abutter reported drainage and runoff problems located at the bottom of the largest drainage area.  He said 30 wells were reported, the newer and deeper wells provide the higher yields.  He said the DES provides a report on wells, the methods and how yields are affected by the age of the well.  He said most of the surveys indicated current conservation methods being used.  He said there is present water use on the site, ie; the trees.  A mature oak tree can draw 50 gallons of water a day.  He said there isn’t clay to hold the water.  He took the subdivision plan and overlaid it on the use map.  He said DES has no rules about wells other than the 75 foot radius requirement.  They calculated each single family home proposed in the subdivision would use approximately 600 gallons per day based on projected square footage of 2000.  He showed existing homes and water uses and the variable ranges.  He said factoring in the information on the subdivision and the resulting changes basically some forest would be removed for the houses, the wetlands would remain, using the 300 gallons per day per unit comes to 2400 gallons per day or 86,000 gallons per year.  He discussed some conservation measures noting 86,000 gallons per year does not exceed the potential resource for the area, but the bedrock wells do have a limited ability to capture the recharge unless they are hydrofractured or pounded.  He noted septics are on-site, there is return flow of 85-90% return to the general area.  He reviewed the recommended deed restrictions of all plumbing would be high efficiency and low flow.  Irrigated areas very limited, pools not filled from on-site wells.  As things are built some recharge could be incorporated such as roof drains, drainage swales, run-off to slow the water.  To determine the adequacy of the surrounding water levels, he suggested a non-pumping well that would give ambient water level.  He gave Mr. Dill and Ch. Miller a copy of the report and asked to take questions.

QUESTIONS & ANSWERS:  Mr. Dance asked if Mr. Goetz could tell where the aquifer comes from noting the area is along a spine of land, was there a tie in to the Connecticut River?  Mr. Goetz said it was coming from the fractures as outlined on the first map, re-charge comes directly from rainfall, there are no other sources of water for the area.  

            Ken Walsh said since the recharge comes from surface and rainfall, where does the water come from and where does it go?  Mr. Goetz said basically the well sites as shown on the plans may not be the perfect location for the well, the smaller lots would be more limited to finding a higher yield fracture. He asked how many years it takes to recharge?  Mr. Goetz said 7” per year per acre would recharge the area.  Mr. Walsh asked to correlate it to static.  Mr. Goetz said an ambient well would show the seasonal changes.  He said a pumping well would not reflect true

Walpole Planning Board Minutes 8/14/07 page 5

static unless it is unused for a period of time.  He said an older well could be crusted up and not pumping properly.  He said static is a relative term at times.  He said a drop in static could indicate a drop in the water table.

            Mr. Dance said when the pond goes dry the surrounding area wells go dry.  He asked what would happen if a drought persisted for a few years, what impact would the new proposed wells have on the area water?  Mr. Goetz thought there are more wells, but the existing use based on the trees alone could affect the overall water.  Mr. Dance mentioned some of the better producing wells.  Due to the direction of the runoff, if the weather took a turn for the worse, the persons along the spine would have water shortage and adding another 8 wells to the watershed would be a concern. 

            Mr. Blount, Ms. Steisel and others asked if the 8 additional wells would affect the abutters water?  Mr. Goetz said in order to answer the question a more detailed study would be required. Mr. Dance thought the more water drawn on an already limited watershed the more likely there would be less available for everyone.  Mr. Goetz referred to the recommendations for conservation to aid the recharge.  Ms. Steisel felt the recommendations were viable but there was no insurance the measures would be enforced.  Mr. Goetz said it could be added as a deed restriction.  Mr. Hunter said he had a hard time believing those recommendations would alleviate the extra water use by the 8 new lots. 

            Mr. Sawyer asked if the recharge would increase by removing trees.  Mr. Goetz said it would reduce the water taken out but may not help the recharge. 

            Ms. Houge said there is a historic water shortage for not only her parent’s home on Meetinghouse Road but many of the abutters and she was concerned the added lots would add to the existing water problems in the area.

            Ch. Miller asked if all the abutters were drawing from the same fracture?  He said no matter how many wells are added, it is hard to determine exactly where the water comes from.  He said over the years as it has grown, perhaps that has affected the water.  He asked if there was a way to allow only 4 wells, have it monitored before more wells are added based on the history of the 4 new wells?  Mr. Goetz said the only way would be to drill the wells and monitor them.  He said the well locations on the maps might not be the best place to locate the wells.  Ch. Miller asked if the 8 lots would have a greater impact within the 8 lots rather than the abutters asking if the abutters may be affecting one another even without the additional wells?  Mr. Goetz said yes it could be the case. 

            Mr. Dave Howell asked about the age of the existing water?  Mr. Goetz said they can carbon date the water.  Mr. Hunt asked to look at the fracture map asking how the fractures were determined?  Mr. Goetz said USGS studies were done a couple of years ago, they take the previous studies and formulate the data, aerial photos in black and white, satellite and field surveys showing the fractures that are eons old.  Mr. Hunt asked if fracture lines could be built like the oil companies do?  Mr. Goetz said no, oil extraction is a different technique.  He asked about other techniques to capture water.  Mr. Goetz said hydro-fracturing is the newest technique.

            Ms. Steisel asked if hydro-fracturing could ruin a fracture.  Mr. Goetz said an earthquake could cause a problem but not residential well drilling.  Mr. Walsh said a person could be a distance away from the fracture and still be drawing from the fracture.  Mr. Goetz agreed some bedrock wells could draw from a mile away.

 Ch. Miller asked how the well dates affect the water, wondering if the newer wells were better producers and had created problems for the older wells.

Mr. Dance said it seemed wells off the Wentworth spine seem to have more water the new wells were going to draw off that single spine.  Mr. Blount said the principal area of stressed wells are depending on the one fault line, the new lots appear to be drawing off the same fault.  Mrs. Daniels asked to see where Wentworth Road was on the fracture map. 

           Walpole Planning Board Minutes 8/14/07 page 6

Mr. Goetz said field data might show a more realistic idea of where the wells would be located.  He said the drainage map shows a divide that might be questionable.  Ch. Miller asked if he had experienced a situation like this?  Mr. Goetz said he sat on the groundwater commission at the State house and grappled with the issue.  He said the State regulations are site specific to insure water availability but some of the specifics would require more detailed studies. 

            Mr. Merklein asked based on what Mr. Goetz has seen in the past what is the actual bottom line on the effect on the abutters?  Mr. Goetz said at present the results are a general overview of the conditions for this level of study.  He said more detailed investigations could answer the question but the information gathered is useable to determine a general overview.  He said a suggestion to do a fracture trace of the area was made but is only good down to 500 ft, many of the wells are 600 feet and beyond.  He said physically drilling the wells would give additional information.

Mr. Merklein asked about a sample well to measure the effect.  Mr. Goetz said a large groundwater withdrawal well is done with monitoring wells.  Mr. Merklein said the monitoring wells could be the existing wells.  Mr. Goetz agreed saying if you were trying to get the effect of a withdrawal and future conditions the large well would need to be located where the withdrawal would take place as opposed to a surrounding area.  Mr. Merklein asked, one well super pumped within the subdivision and measure it there for additional information?  Mr. Goetz said that’s what has been done in the past for large groundwater withdrawals.  Mr. Dill and Mr. Kasper said large groundwater withdrawals are for 40,000 gallons an hour, this subdivision would not warrant that type of study.  Mr. Goetz agreed. 

Attny. Kasper observed most of the problem lies within the north up hill part of the property.  The abutters in the worst shape are to the right of Wentworth Road and the fracture is to the left of Wentworth Road.  The data also shows the drainage is north of Hooper Rd.  He said the surface flow appeared to flow north of the subdivision.  Mr. Goetz clarified the elevation drops to the south.  Mr. Kasper said it is pure speculation on Mr. Goetz’s part unless all 8 wells were drilled and monitored for a number of years what and if any impact those wells would have on the water supply that there is no way to determine the impact.  Mr. Goetz said the desktop study gives adequate information based on the level of the study and existing conditions they are not doing a large groundwater withdrawal so it is beyond the desktop study results to determine the actual effect on the surrounding water supply.  Mr. Kasper said by cutting down 4 or 5 trees per lot it would reduce the withdrawal.  Mr. Goetz agreed noting his recommendations.  Mr. Kasper said if the Planning board puts in the recommended restrictions everything possible would be done to recapture the water including the septics, roof flows, restrictions on irrigations, no pool filling, it appears there is almost a zero impact.  Mr. Goetz agreed if the Board implements the conservation restrictions it would significantly reduce the impact.  

Mr. Dance asked if D & D would pay to have his well replaced if it ran dry in the next 10 years?  The answer was no.  Mr. Carignan said in regard to speculation, his first well was pounded, it ran dry, the second hydro-fractured yielding 1.5 gallons.

Mr. DeCoste asked how to determine the direction of the flows from the fractures?  Mr. Goetz said it could not be determined but likely flowed towards the Connecticut River.  He said without a pump test he couldn’t determine where or which fracture was being utilized.  Ch. Miller thought the 4 or 5 houses built in the past 4 years could have affected the previous wells.  He said it seemed the weather played the most important role in recharging and available water supply.  Mr. Goetz agreed saying dug wells would run dry first the bedrock wells take a longer time to go dry but take longer to recover from a drought.

Ms. Aslinger asked in addition to his recommendations would it be recommended to reduce the number of lots based on the density to 4 or 6 lots noting he had mentioned the density of some of the lots limited acreage didn’t allow for more than one 75 ft. radius.  Mr. Goetz said the State requires the 75 ft. radius but some of the smaller lots have less area for moving it

Walpole Planning Board Minutes 8/14/07 page 7

around.  Ms. Aslinger said he had mentioned the maps don’t necessarily show exactly where the wells would be rather showing where they would fit in.  Mr. Kasper objected to the question saying Mr. Goetz wasn’t an expert on where the wells should be located.  Ms. Aslinger said she had heard Mr. Goetz mention the density earlier and wondered if putting 20 wells vs. 8 wells or 4 wells instead of 8 would improve the chances of the water supply being less impacted.  Mr. Goetz said without having any of the wells drilled there is no way of knowing.

Mrs. Daniels asked if by hydro-fracting a well, does it make things better for the surrounding properties?  Mr. Goetz did not believe so.

Mr. Merklein said since we were talking serious speculation about a very serious matter, he asked if there was another step to take in order to alleviate the speculation that wouldn’t incur a major expense but insure the Board a few years later wouldn’t have abutting properties without water?  He asked how to get a clearer picture.  Mr. Goetz said hydro-geological studies range in size in scope.  He said the level of this study was to determine baseline conditions make some recommendations to mitigate and address the fact there is a current water use on the property ie, the trees.  By taking the trees away vs. a well use, to incorporate restrictive measures and capture some of the surface drainage through swales.  They were trying to present some scenarios to mitigate some future conditions but to promise what will exactly happen 5-10 years in the future is not known. 

Ch. Miller said he understood there was no way to be certain whether 4 lots or 8 lots would make a direct impact and it is speculative.  He asked if the only guidelines Planning Boards have in NH is to go by the 75 ft. well radius, whereas in VT there are more restrictive guidelines.  Are there no other measures the Board can take to prevent a subdivision from impacting surrounding properties?  Mr. Goetz said he was correct but more restrictive guidelines are not on the books at this time.  Mr. Merklein read from Walpole’s subdivision regulations questioning what the wording meant by being adequate.  Mr. Goetz and others thought it only referred to the 75 ft. radius, if it were more restrictive it would have a flow rate or another measure to go by. 

Suzanne Steisel said she thought the impact on the abutting properties had to be considered.  She is concerned about property values declining when the water becomes less available.  Ch. Miller said the single growth houses in recent years have also affected the surrounding areas. 

Mrs. Dretzin suggested rather than the zoning being determined on frontage or lot size why not consider the availability of resources on a parcel.  Ch. Miller said he agreed with the idea however the current zoning does not allow for it, that D & D’s parcel is within the Rural Agricultural and Residential zones and meets the current requirements. 

Ch. Miller thanked Mr. Goetz for the presentation, the audience applauded him and a five minute break was called.

Meeting resumed 9:45pm

            Ch. Miller announced the conclusion of the water study, as he thought it might be, it was inconclusive but a good effort.  He said he thought the recommendations were appropriate, he said the Board was at its decision deadline.  He said after hearing the report and to adequately write up the resulting conditions of a possible approval he felt the Board needed more time.  He asked Mr. Dill for an extension until the next meeting.  Mr. Dill said he needed to consult with his partner did the Board need an answer tonight?  Ch. Miller said yes the Board would not be meeting again before the next meeting.  He said he is still very concerned about the future of the abutters water supply, he mentioned possible reassessment of reducing the number of lots or restrict the number of initial lots/wells to help the concerns.  He said he is also concerned about the road design and final plans and feels the Board needs additional time to formulate adequately written conditions.  Mr. Dill said they had cut the number of lots already but they don’t seem to make any progress with negotiations, he asked if it was speculative to expect a decision at the

Walpole Planning Board Minutes 8/14/07 page 8

next meeting if they grant the additional time.  Ch. Miller said he did not see a reason why the Board would go beyond the September meeting with a decision.  Members agreed.  Selectman Miller asked if the work session could be used to finalize Board action.  Sec. Aslinger said the Selectmen had on more than one occasion felt the work sessions were to be limited to all other business besides review of applications before the Board and she felt it was appropriate to maintain the work sessions as non application review meetings.  Selectmen Miller said they would ask this as a favor for Planning Board members who normally do not attend the work sessions to come for the review and could leave immediately after.  Ch. Miller stated he would not be able to attend the meeting and would not agree to hold the review at the work session meeting. 

Mr. Dill asked if he incorporated all the recommendations resulting from the study, would the Board be willing to make their final decision at tonight’s meeting?  Ch. Miller said if he wanted a final action by the Board tonight under the circumstances he would recommend the Board deny the subdivision because they would not being able to make an informed decision based on lack of information.  Mr. Dill asked if there would be further delay at the next meeting?  Ch. Miller and others agreed the Board would have adequate time to digest the information provided in the study and to come to a final determination at the Sept. 11, 2007 meeting.  Selectman Miller suggested Mr. Dill be put on as the first agenda item.  Members asked if they could have copies of the studies.  Sec. Aslinger said she would make copies. 

Mr. Blount asked if a copy of the deed restrictions would be available for review prior to the next meeting, answer was probably not.  Ch. Miller said they would be available after the next meeting. 

Ch. Miller decided to officially close the Public Hearing, further discussion will be limited to the Board’s own review.  Ch. Miller recognized Mr. Carignan.  He asked if it is feasible, in the future if Town water could be extended to the Wentworth Road area?   Ch. Miller said it would be an option and could be studied, he thought it would be paid for by the Water department and through taxation.  Selectman Miller said it was a viable possibility and would protect property values. 

Mr. Dill asked how the Board would proceed on his proposal?  Ch. Miller said the road information was basically agreed to, the recommendations from the study would be incorporated and he would suggest limiting the number of lots to allow for an interim point as a safety net for everyone.  Mr. Dill said he would not agree with such a restriction they would not be able to go into it knowing half of the land would be given up.  Attny. Kasper agreed saying they would not abide by that restriction, they are coming before the Board with an 8 lot subdivision, it can be approved or not, the Board cannot say you have 4 lots for a while and see what happens. 

Henry Fletcher asked if citizens could petition the Town to have the water brought up to the area?  Answer was yes by a warrant article. Selectman Miller thought the impact to the tax rate would be little, it would add to property values and there is plenty of water.  It would be whether a water line could be brought up there.

Secretary Aslinger said she would send a follow up letter to D & D outlining the information discussed at the meeting as a reference for the members so they would be prepared for the September meeting.

            C.  Site Plan Revocation North Meadow Plaza - Hockensmith comment (This item was passed over until the Sept. meeting, noting Sec. Alsinger did received an opinion from Attny. Hockesmith too late to be adequately reviewed for tonight’s meeting and an invoicel to be signed.)

VI.       New Business:  Preliminary Conceptual Consultations

            A.  Richard Drew surveyor, Hearns Lot Line Adjustment on Church St. North Walpole.

Walpole Planning Board Minutes 8/14/07 page 9

Matt Drew was present.  He submitted the application, fees, abutters list and made a brief description of the proposal it is in the Residential B zone. A motion was made by Mr. Merklein and seconded by Bob Miller to place the application on the agenda for the Sept. 11, 2007 meeting, motion carried unanimously.

            B.  Chamberlain Machine - Special Exception recommendation, Site Plan Review.  Attny. Gary Kinyon presented the Board with the application, fees and abutters list.  He asked for feedback.  He said he understood they would need to get a special exception recommendation from the Planning Board prior to applying for the special exception from the Zoning Board, and if granted a special exception return to the Planning Board for a site plan review for Chamberlain Machine on Lot 2 of tonight’s approved Hubbard subdivision.  He asked if they could submit additional materials prior to the Sept. 11th deadline as noted by the Secretary in order to be placed on the agenda for a public hearing for that meeting date.  He wanted to know if there was other information needed besides what is required in the zoning ordinance under Rural Agricultural Article VIII. I a-g.  Sec. Aslinger referred to a letter sent to Mr. Tousley in March reviewing the procedures for special exception recommendation.  She said the letter referred to the Zoning Ordinance Article VIII. Rural Ag. District, Special Exception I. a-g as criteria the Board would use in order to make a recommendation.  Attny. Kinyon agreed but questioned whether the Board according to the regulations would consider anything beyond a. i) and ii).  Members agreed those two criteria would be the only required.  Attny. Kinyon said they would be providing the Board with the zoning application and other supporting information prior to the Sept. 11th final deadline but would want the Board to address the two criteria above at the public hearing if the Board agrees.

Ch. Miller questioned whether a public hearing was necessary, his thinking in the past the Board would make a non-binding review but usually not held a public hearing.  Sec. Aslinger said it is only required for this particular zone and use change but it is required.  Sec. Aslinger asked for clarification under Section C. only a. i. and ii. would be reviewed by the Planning Board?  Answer was yes, remaining criteria would be reviewed by the Zoning Board.

C.  Jack Franks - Minor 2 lot subdivision on Ramsay Hill Rd.  Not present.

D.  Joe DiBernardo surveyor presented the Board with preliminary plans for two minor 2 lot subdivision located on Barnett Hill Rd. for Chris Monahan.  On the first plan it shows a 30 foot driveway that should be a 50 foot ROW, Joe will confer with the road agent about the driveway.  He will be presenting both plans for the October meeting.  The second plan was similar.  Ch. Miller asked about restrictions on the Webb Farm. Henry Fletcher said the restrictions were no longer in effect they had a time limit on them that has expired. 

VII.            Communications and Miscellaneous

            A.  The work session was cancelled for August.

            B.  Other

VIII.            Meeting adjourned at 10:20pm

cc:  All PB members, ZBA, BOS, Town Clerk, Fire, Water, Road Dept.

Attny. Kasper, Attny. Hockensmith

Posted:  Town Hall, Burdick’s Market, www.walpoleplanningboard.org,, www.thewalpolean.com                

 

Cruise Night At The Real Twist

     The Real Twist Ice Cream stand in Walpole, NH  will hold its final Classic Car Cruise Night of the season  on Sunday,  September 2nd, from 6-9PM. Here’s a chance for the whole family to enjoy a Sunday evening looking at old and antique cars, while enjoying pizza, hot dogs and ice cream. There will be live music by Vinnie Dibernardo. Anyone who brings his classic car to show will get a free regular sized sundae. Everyone visiting can get free jimmies, diptop or flavorburst with any cup or cone. Make sure to enter the drawing for free ice cream or DVD’s!

      The Real Twist is located next to Real to Reel Video at the North Meadow Plaza in  Walpole. It is open noon – 9PM, seven days a week, through Sept. 3rd.. Enjoy your ice cream outside, in the lovely garden, or under the porch. See you there!

Ed. Note: Thanks to Marche Brown, Historical Society Publicity Chair, for this information on the new Walpole 2008 calendar!  CCB

Ed. Note: Thanks to Lucy Weber, Board secretary, for these Zoning Board minutes.  CCB

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

Walpole, NH  03608

Minutes-----15 August 2007

PRESENT:  M. Mansouri, Ch., L. Weber, J. Galloway-Leclerc, B. Webb, 

David Calhoun

ABSENT:            L. Carignan, L. Britton, M. T. Lester

Note:  These minutes are unapproved and will be reviewed on 19 September 2007 for errors, omissions and corrections.

The meeting was called to order at 7:30pm.   The Chair appointed Bill Webb and David Calhoun as voting members.

PUBLIC HEARING #1:  Frank W. Whitcomb Construction Corp., by Richard A. Fraser, One Source Properties & Permitting, LLC., Gravel Pit Permit Application.

  Mr. Fraser presented an overview of the project, following the plans and booklet submitted.  The booklet also contains best management practices to be used in the project.  The tract of land involved is 229 acres on the other side of Old Drewsville Road from the Old Drewsville airport.  The actual excavation will be 1.4 acres.  The total impact will be to less than 2 acres.  Photos were shown and the excavated area will be where the trees are now.  A photo was shown of the existing berm and of the existing property entrance.  The existing access point will be used for trucks entering and exiting the property. 

  The first plan sheet shows the existing site using 2 foot contour intervals because the site is very flat.  The notes show how the plan was drawn.  The total area is just under two acres.  Test pit #2 shows the water table is at 6 feet below the surface.  The construction sequence shown is the best for the environment to lessen impact on surface waters.  The State of NH Stormwater Management and Control Book references have been incorporated into the plans.  Jonathan Sisson did the wetlands assessment.  Two test pits have been drilled in the project area and two are outside the project area.  Mr. Thomas Fitzgerald asked from the audience asked when the pits were dug.  Mr. Fraser said they were put in just prior to the application in May of this year.

  The second plan shows the final grading of the site.  The existing berm is parallel to the road, and turns just before the place the project begins.  They will continue the berm along the road and wrap it around at the end of the project to meet the existing tree line.  All runoff will be contained within the project area.  This is a natural treatment.  There will be no migrating sediment.  The gravelly soil will allow stormwater to perc easily, so there will be no runoff.  Further reference was made to the Stormwater Management book.  The final grade goes down from the surface at a 3 to 1 ratio.  Mr. Fraser said this will work out close to an 18 degree slope.  The excavation will hit the water table at six feet or so, and will continue to excavate down to recover further material.  The slope will be such that a person or animal falling into the water would be able to get out…The resultant pond will be about 1.4 acres, and will have an average depth of 11.5 feet.  The volume of the material to be excavated is just over 25,000 cubic yards.  The material will be used for the Alstead project to fix damages from the flood.  The project is not long lived and will not exceed three years.

  The third sheet focuses on best management practices and reclamation.  The right hand side has seed mixes for this type of site, taken from the state Reclaiming Sites in NH Manual.  Three seed mixes have been proven effective for conditions in gravel sites.  The site is simple and flat—best management practices include installation of a silt fence, hay bales, maintenance details, and how to design the swale.  Also included is how to manage the construction.  The entrances will be 50 feet of one and one-half inch stone to remove debris from truck tires.  The last section addresses what areas are required by RSA 155:E(3) to be covered throughout the excavatihn process: fuel and chemical handling and site safety.  Major points include reclamation, which is easy—build and seed a berm.  A fuel storage facility exists across the street with a secondary containment tank.  No fuel will be stored on site.  Dust control is accomplished by the short distance to the road.  The site will average 8000 cubic yards a year.  The construction season is 270 days per year, for an average of two trucks per day, but there could be up to 10-20 trucks on any given day.

  The site is 42 feet from other lands of  FWW; 372 feet from the closest property to the northeast; 225 feet to the closest property to the east; 990 feet from the closest property to the south, and 1215 feet from the closest property to the southwest.  Best management practices will be used for stump and brush management, which will be kept on site.  The booklet addresses how to manage spills if a line breaks or petroleum spills.

  Ms. Weber asked if chemicals would be stored on site.  The only chemicals which would be needed would be calcium to hold down the dust and grease guns which are stored in the trucks.  Ms. Weber asked if the Alstead project was expected to last three years.  Mr. Fraser did not know if that job would extend past this year.  Mr. Webb asked what the volume of water in the pond would be.  Mr. Fraser said it could be calculated.  Mr. Webb wanted to know if it was worth considering a dry hydrant.  There is a dry hydrant in the ponds across the street.  Water is taken from there to Lane Construction to suppress dust.  Ms. Weber asked if there will be any blasting at this site.  There will be none.

  Ms. Mansouri asked about the amount of a reclamation bond.  A figure has not been discussed, but figures for bonds are all over the map.  A large project in Swanzey had a recommended bond of $2300 per acre.  Danbury asked for $600 per acre.  Reclamation will only be the pond area.  Ms. Mansouri asked about the volume of gravel to be removed.  The volume was calculated by computer software to be 25,000 cubic yards.  Ms. Mansouri read into the record the letter from Southwest Regional about its review of the application for completeness.  All checklist items and statutory requirements have been met.  The ZBA must make a determination that the resulting body of water will be healthy and safe.  A three to one slope is required to a depth of six feet below the waterline, plus thick vegetation to deter children from the pond.

  Ms. Susan Warren asked if it was such a small project, why was it a three year project.  Also, is there gravel available elsewhere?  All material will be used for FWW projects.  There will be no sales to third parties.  The soil delineations on the property are shown on the plans.  Chocura soils are wetlands, and will not be excavated.  Ninegret soils are too fine to be used as construction materials. The only decent material is in the project area.  Ms. Warren asked what if they hit solid ledge, will you come back and ask to use explosives.  Mr. Fraser said it was not wise economically to blast in that area.  Ms. Mansouri noted they would have to come back to the Board to ask for changes to the permit.  Ms. Warren  asked why three years?  Ms Mansouri said they would have to reapply after three years.  In the meantime the ZBA will inspect the pit once a year.  The ZBA will listen to problems.  Mr. Fraser suggested that before going to the ZBA they contact Mr. Frank Whitcomb directly about any problems.  Several audience members said they had tried that in the past and that he was unavailable.

Ms. Marcia Frankiewicz raised the problem of current Lane Corporation blasting.  She was told it was up to the state to control, then the state referred her to the Selectmen and nothing happened.  Where is the power to get help?  Ms. Mansouri said they can come and complain to the ZBA, which will refer the matter to the Selectmen for enforcement.  The statement was made that Whitcomb’s is an eyesore now, and who is enforcing that?          Mr. Thomas Fitzgerald said complaints have been made about FWW property on both sides of the road.  He said junk has been buried in the present site.  There is standing water in the treeline.  There were three small ponds on the other side of the road.  Now there is just one big pond.  Whitcomb’s track record of running gravel pits in the state of New Hampshire is not good, and he doesn’t think he should do another one.

  Mr. Fraser said that Jonathan Sisson is a certified wetlands specialist and soil specialist.  He said that FWW cannot extend beyond what is permitted by the Board.  Ms. Frankiewicz asked how do we know they won’t go on ten years down the road.  There is junk everywhere now.  How can we tell they won’t do that on this site?  Mr. Fraser said he doesn’t know what plans are for the future.

  Ms. Warren said she has been in residence four years now.  Blasts in the Lane quarry have knocked her silver tea service off the shelf, and caused vertical cracks in their walls.  She talked to the quarry and then to the selectmen, but did not get an answer back.  The quarry won’t pay for the cracked wall.  The Selectmen still would not help.  She hears that the operation is regulated, but there is no help when the regulation is violated.  Ms. Shirley Smith said that she lives right in back of the site and heard a blast at 1:30 today.  Others noted the blast occurred at 1:18.  Ms. Frankiewicz said her foundation was cracked from blasting on July 21st. She also expressed concerns about existing shallow wells on that side of the road.  When the last pond was dug, her mother-in-law’s well dried up.

  Mr. William Lundgren said there has been a track record of non-compliance, and the Selectmen do not have a good track record of enforcement.  Why would they not re-open prior pits, unless their track record would not allow it?  He doesn’t want the houses damaged by whatever FWW hides behind the berm. Ms. Warren asked if you can specify that the property must be maintained and reports of maintenance filed?  Ms. Mansouri answered that the ZBA inspects the site once a year.  The owners have to come before the Board if they are not maintaining the property according to the terms of the permit.

  Ms. Rita Whitcomb noted that the existing berm is ugly, and wouldn’t it be more cost effective to dig the gravel elsewhere?  Mr. Fraser said he thinks all the other FWW assets have been sold, so there is nowhere else for them to go.  Ms. Whitcomb said they could buy from other people rather than starting a new pit.  She does not want her property value diminished.  In the past, properties maintained by FWW were allowed to generate dust.  Mr. Jim Whitcomb was concerned that opening up this property will make it look like Lane Construction soon.  This part of town has not been helped by the Zoning Board.

Ms. Fritzi Till said this is about credibility.  She has lived for 22 years in Drewsville, and blasting occurs there that would not occur in the village of Walpole.  Somewhere along the line the people need to be listened to.  Ms. Warren said her house is already discolored by dust.  Ms. Whitcomb said there was a huge outcry over the crane business proposed by Matt Phillips.  He couldn’t build in town even though he is a good neighbor and would have kept his property up well.  This part of town needs to be treated equally and to be listened to.  Ms. Frankiewicz said when the Selectmen run for office, they never come to her house.  They are excluded and do not have granite curbing.  Mr. William Lundgren heard back in the day that Frank Whitcomb said he would not come any closer to Drewsville.  He takes a man for his word.

  Ms. Till asked if this excavation is solely for Alstead.  Mr. Fraser said that in 2007 the material will go to Alstead.  The 2008 contracts have not yet been awarded.  The permit will last three years.  He asked that they look at the positive.  If all the material is used in one year, the project will be done.  He has no idea what the 2008 projects will be.  Ms. Till asked what about a one year permit?  Ms. Mansouri said permits are for three years and are withdrawn if no substantial work is done on the site for one year.  There is a procedure to ask for an extension, which requires the owner to come back to the Board.  The Board may include reasonable conditions in the permit.  Ms. Weber noted that there are two limits.  The first is the three year time limit in the permit.  Then the owner must come back to the Board for and extension.  Then there is the area specified in the permit.  If the owner wants to operate outside the specified area, he must come back to the Board to modify the permit.

  Ms. Till asked if there would be no blasting, would there be monitoring of particulate matter.  Mr. Fraser said most of the excavation would be below water, and there would be no fugitive dust.  They would use an excavator to dig the pond.  Ms. Till asked about the noise level.  Mr. Fraser said it is pretty quiet when you dig in water.  Lane is a quarry site.  That is where you have this issue.  This site is not a quarry and will have no huge haul trucks.  He does not know the prior history of permits at Whitcomb’s.

  Ms. Barbara Bragg asked if you don’t need a permit to build a pond.  Mr. Fraser said you need a permit if you are impacting a wetland, but not if you dig on land that is not wet.  If the pond sits, eventually, vegetation will come up and it will become a wetland when the area around the pond meets the Army Corps of Engineers definition of a wetland.  It doesn’t happen overnight.  Where does the water come from?  Ground water finds its own level.  Here it is at six feet below ground level.  The closest wetland is 87 feet from the edge of the project line.  Pink and black flags have been set out there and numbered.  Ms. Bragg asked if the property across the street is a certified wetland and therefore cleaning up that property is a no-brainer.  Mr. Fraser noted the state allows excavation within 25 feet of a wetland.  Ms. Bragg suggested they should all get together and get people from their area elected to the ZBA and Selectboard.

  Ms. Jackie Bujnevicie asked if the applicant needs to prove that property values of surrounding land will not be affected.  Ms. Warren said that RSA 155:A(3)(b) says it must not cause diminution of property values or change the character of the neighborhood.  Has a study been done?  Ms. Mansouri said the town already allows excavations in the area, so she does not think this will be significantly different from what is already there.  Ms. Warren said they were already getting thousands of dollars in damage to their homes.  Mr. Webb said there has been no indication of how the project will affect surrounding properties in this presentation.  It hasn’t been addressed.  Mr. Fraser said that are of town has been unchanged for decades.  The construction industry is indigenous to the area.  No one will notice it.

  Ms. Warren mentioned RSA 155:E(4) and her concerns regarding the effect on highways, and concerns about dust, safety and nuisance,.  Mr. Fraser said the dust will be contained.  The Board could require trucks to be covered.  He suggested the abutters lean on the Board to be proactive.  Ms. Warren asked isn’t it on Mr. Whitcomb to prove no impact?  Mr. Fraser said the problems in the neighborhood go back years.  Ms. Warren reiterated that a blast at 1:18 today and dust cloud at 1:18 affected her, and this project will add onto those effects.  Mr. Webb reminded her that what Lane Construction does is not relevant to this application.  Ms. Warren reiterated that no studies have been done to show how this will impact the neighborhood. 

  Mr. Britton said the quarry was there when Ms. Warren bought her home.  Ms. Warren said she inquired of the town and did not get told about it.  The issue here is a lack of a good track record.  Ms. Mansouri said ttat this is the first this Board has heard of the problems.  She suggested that Ms. Warren take pictures of the damage, bring them before the ZBA, and we can write to the Selectboard.  Mr. Britton reminded that we should not confuse the Lane issue with this permit application.  Ms. Warren said there was no way to remove aggregate without dust, big machinery and diesel emissions. 

Mr. Jim Whitcomb said issuing this permit is going to open up 229 acres down their road.  The whole mountain will be gone like the other side of Route 123.  Whitcomb started that and will continue on this side of Route 123.  He asked the Board to turn the permit down.

  A comment was made that the Board should not think adding gravel pits is not a big deal.  It is a big deal.  Why not add more old trailers to other parts of town?  Ms. Warren said she had checked the cost of midsize aggregate and FWW will have $55,000 to $100,000 savings if they buy aggregate rather than open this pit.  So why not buy the aggregate unless they are looking to future projects?  Mr. Paul Mascot said he had lived in Drewsville longer than anyone here.  On the other side of Drewsville Road, FWW said they would remove 8-10 truckloads of material per day and no materials would be stored there, but now it’s a pigpen.  He asked why no one from FWW was here tonight.  He noted that FWW would not sell to third parties, but they could use the gravel elsewhere.  The Alstead project was already bid, how did FWW figure their costs?  He has not trust in FWW.  Mr. Webb asked if anyone was there when the fire pond was dug.  Mr. Mascot said there was no dust problem then, but they won’t load material directly from this pond, but will leave it to dry out first.

  Mr. Britton asked Mr. Fraser if FWW had any long term plan for the rest of the 229 acres.  Mr. Fraser said he had asked Mr. Whitcomb why he did not expand and go further into the property?  Mr. Whitcomb said he did not want to.  Mr. Webb asked if he just wants a foot in the door.  Mr. Fraser said the issue is regarding only this proposed operation.  Mr. Britton asked what kind of soils are on the rest of the property?  Mr. Fraser said that had not been looked at.  An audience member said there is gravel eight feet deep all over the property all the way down to the four corners.  The cornfield is gravel.  They will drain the wetlands into the pond.  Houses in the area have sump pumps in their cellars.  After the gravel is taken, there is still plenty of rock.

  Mr. Michael Barnett asked if they were digging below the water line, how are they going to keep diesel contamination out of people’s wells.  Mr. Fraser said best management practices for fueling address the problem.  Storage of fuels is with secondary containment systems and covered containers.  There is a secure gate at the entrance.  There will be training for employees about containment of spills and contaminated soils, and reporting of spillage when required.  Ms. Warren asked who watches to see this is done?  Mr. Fraser said under state statute it is up to Board regulators.  Ms. Weber asked if FWW would have a problem if the Board were to issue a permit conditioned on no storage of chemicals or fuel on the site.  Mr. Fraser said that would not be a problem.

  Ms. Galloway-Leclerc suggested that issues with the property across the street might be addressed by a Planning Board Site Plan, and they could address it with the Planning Board.  An audience member stated they had been to the Planning Board, and had the same problem getting the Selectmen to enforce.  Mr. Sawyer said that the only request he know of was an issue of non-compliance with the berm, and the Selectboard required the berm to be put in.  We have no code enforcer other than the Selectmen.  Ms. Mansouri noted the Selectmen meet on Thursdays at 7:30.  An audience member asked doesn’t the Planning Board drive around to see the problems?  Mr. Webb said that the problem must be brought to a Board meeting.  Ms. Weber said that the town has no code enforcer.  All the work is done by three Selectmen and the volunteer Planning and Zoning Boards.  There is a limited amount of time and person hours available to deal with these issues, and a limited number of people willing to do these jobs.  Zoning Board members have brought issues back to the Board when they are aware of them, but otherwise, our policy is to have someone either bring the matter up at a Board meeting or put in a written complaint. 

  Ms. Mansouri asked if anyone had anything to add at this time.  Ms. Weber asked if a site view might be helpful. Mr. Webb asked to what avail.  Ms. Weber said that she would like to get a clearer idea of the location of the wetlands.  Ms. Warren asked about the timing to make a decision.  Ms. Weber said that the statute requires a decision within 20 days.  Mr. Fraser indicated he did not think his client would agree to an extension.  Ms. Bragg said that the wetlands issue is huge, and really needs to be addressed so as not to expand the problem.  Mr. Calhoun said he wouldn’t mind looking at the site.  Ms. Galloway-Leclerc suggested we invite the Conservation Commission..  Mr. Sawyer said the Conservation Commission has mapped the wetlands in town, so it would be a good idea to include them.  Ms. Weber asked if the soils expert could come as well.  Mr. Fraser said yes.

  The site visit was scheduled for Monday, August 27th at 10:00 AM at the site on Old Drewsville Road.  The continued hearing will be resumed immediately after the site visit at the Town Hall.  The hearing was adjourned and continued to August 27th, at which time all issues may still be addressed.

****Please note that after this meeting, the site visit and continued hearing were rescheduled at the request of the applicant.  The site visit will be held on Wednesday, September 19th, 2007, before the regularly scheduled meeting of the Board, and the continued hearing will resume on Wednesday, September 19th, at 7:30 PM at the regularly scheduled September  Board meeting.****

  Mr. Britton arrived during the Public Hearing.  At this time, Ms. Mansouri recognized his presence, and asked Mr. Calhoun to step down as a voting member.  Mr. Webb continued as a voting member to replace Mr. Carignan.  Ms. Lester also arrived during the hearing.

NEW BUSINESS:  Robin Casey of KC Signs for Walgreens sign replacement.  Ms. Casey presented drawings of the current Rite-aid signs and the signage Walgreens would like to install.  The initial proposal was for two signs in addition to the signage already in place.  One sign was proposed to have flashing bulbs to advertise specials.  Ms. Casey was informed that that type of sign would not be permitted under the ordinance.  Ms. Mansouri explained that Walgreen’s may replace the existing signage with Walgreen’s signs if they do not change the size of the signage.  Mr. Webb said that if new signs are wanted, Walgreen’s must apply for a variance, as any new signs would be too close to the existing signage.  Ms. Casey said that they will simply reface the existing signs for now, and will return for a variance if more signage is needed.

Virginia Carter, 114 Barnett Hill Road, questions about permitted uses of her property.  Ms. Carter’s home is located in the Rural/Agricultural District.  She planted 950 grape vines on the property in 2003, and is doing business as Barnett Hill Vineyard and West Mountain View Winery.  These are farming activities under Article VIII of the Walpole Zoning Ordinance.  Currently, 100% of products sold are produced on the property.  The State of NH says activities constitute farming activities if 35% of what is sold is produced on the property.  Ms. Carter wanted to know about the sale of vineyard-related items such as corkscrews, etc. not produced on the property.  Ms. Weber said that Article VIII of the Ordinance permits farm stands to sell items produced on the property without a permit.  It does not have language similar to the state’s requiring only 35% of items sold to be produced on the property.  Mr. Sawyer pointed out the town can be more restrictive than the state.  Ms. Lester asked if the Ordinance specified dimensions for roadside stands.  Ms. Mansouri said there were no specifications in the ordinance.  Ms. Carter read the definition of a farm from the state statutes.  Ms. Weber read the Special Exception provisions of  Article VIII.  These conditions would have to be met for any commercial use of the property other than the sale of farm products raised on the premises, which is already a permitted use of the property.  Ms. Carter inquired about obtaining a Special Exception now to ensure she would be able to sell items in the future.  She questioned how specific an application needs to be.  Ms. Mansouri said the application needs to be as specific as possible, and we cannot give general advice on what might or might not be acceptable, either to this Board or for future Boards.  We can only act on a specific application before us.  Mr. Britton reminded the Board we had some discussion in the past about perhaps setting time limits on permits.  Ms. Weber said it had been discussed, but we have no power under the current Ordinance to set time limits for action under a Special Exception.  Ms. Carter was assured that for so long as she is selling only items produced on the property, she is in compliance with the ordinance.

Barbara Bragg, 26 Old Drewsville Road, Sign question.  Ms. Bragg makes pottery in her home, which is in the Rural/Agricultural District.  About three times a year, the Walpole Artisan’s Tour is held, and she would like to install a wooden post and a small sign that could be easily seen from the road.  Under the ordinance, a permanent sign must be 20 feet from the road or a variance is needed. Ms. Weber suggested a temporary sandwich board type sign which could be set out when and where it is needed.  Because Ms. Bragg does not want people coming to her house at other times, she proposed a post and a small moveable sign that could be hung on the post.  The Board agreed that if the sign was brought in at night, it was a temporary sign that did not require a permit.

Local Government Center Q & A on the Role of Alternates:  Ms. Lester was given a copy of the article.  Ms. Mansouri gave an overview of the article.  The article suggests that alternates should sit in the audience and take no part in hearings unless they are appointed to replace an absent member.  Our practice has been to have alternates participate in the debate, but not in the vote.  Mr. Webb said it was contrary to what this Board has been doing for years.  He disagrees with it but will go along if the majority of the Board agrees.  Mr. Calhoun said the article was discouraging to alternates.  Mr. Webb said that he believes that we should have alternates sit with the Board and not as members of the audience.  They are in fact appointed members of the Board.  Mr. Calhoun asked how the alternates could even participate in the present discussion.  Ms. Mansouri said she was very discouraged at reading the article.  Alternates have always sat on the Board, and participated in discussion.  Mr. Sawyer asked why you would have a ten person Board?  Mr. Webb said the state specifies we have a five member Board.  The problem here is this is one attorney offering an opinion this is what to do.  The present format has worked well for us, and he is hesitant to abandon it.  He suggested we go back to the table formation of a 3 sided square.  The three alternates would sit on one side.  We could label them as alternates with the regular members on the other sides, and the alternates could change their seats when they are appointed to vote.  The audience would be more aware they are alternates.  Ms. Mansouri said she was thinking of a similar solution.  Ms. Weber said she thought it would only be a problem if there were a contested hearing and an aggrieved party wanted to argue that the Board was not properly constituted.  Mr. Webb said that whether the alternates sat in the audience or with the Board is not to their detriment.  This is an opinion put forth by a state agency, and he is willing to gamble on sitting alternates where they are separated.  Ms. Mansouri suggested we give the alternates a special spot to sit at, and that they could participate in the discussions and give their opinions to the same extent as any other residents, but would not participate in deliberations once the public portion of the hearing ended.  They certainly have the right to as much participation as other residents.  Ms. Galloway-Leclerc likes the suggestions from Mr. Webb and Ms. Mansouri, with specific chairs for the alternates.  Mr. Britton said the members can change seats to clarify their role.  Mr. Webb said we all contribute to the discussion, and ten different attorneys would interpret this ten different ways.  Mr. Calhoun says they recognized that the alternates are no different than members of the public.  Mr. Webb said that he thinks the alternates are different from the audience.  We cannot just pull people from the audience to decide cases.  Mr. Calhoun said they are already designated as alternates.  He was frustrated reading the article.  They have to be appointed and sworn in.  Ms. Lester commented on the article’s analogy to a ball team, noting that all ballplayers sit together.  Alternates would miss out on the maps and plans if they had to sit in the back.  Ms. Weber read from RSA 673:3 and 673:11, which is all the guidance the statutes give as to Zoning Boards and alternates.  She said that private citizens are allowed to present their knowledge and opinions at hearings.  Mr. Webb said that having the alternates there does not add any extra pressure, it is a good thing.  Ms. Mansouri said we will go back to the U shape for the tables with five seats for the voting members to make it clear who is deliberating.  Mr. Sawyer said perhaps we need legislation to clear it up.

  Ms. Mansouri thanked the Board members for their indulgence for the time the meeting took, but said it was important for all to have had their say.

Home Businesses in the Rural/Agricultural Dictrict.  Ms. Weber raised the issue of asking the Planning Board to recommend including the home business language now allowed in the Residential and Commercial Districts to be included in the Rural/Agricultural District as well.  More and more people are working from their homes, and we do not want to burden them unnecessarily.  Mr. Britton moved, and Ms. Galloway-Leclerc seconded that we send a letter to the Planning Board asking them to present this change for the next town meeting.  All were in favor.

  Ms. Mansouri reminded Board members of the OEP Conference on October 13th at Loon Mountain, and the Gravel Pit Training to be held here in Walpole at the Town Hall from 9:00 AM to 12:00 noon on October 9th.  All Board members are urged to attend if at all possible.

Minutes of July Meeting.  It was noted that Dr. Pena lives on Watkins Hill Road, not March Hill as written.  With this correction, acceptance of the minutes was moved, seconded, and unanimously approved. 

The meeting was adjourned at 10:33 PM.  The next meeting will be held on Wednesday, 19 September, 2007 at 7:30 PM.

 

****Please note that the site visit and continued hearing on the proposed FWW gravel pit on Old Drewsville Road have been rescheduled as follows:

Site visit:  6:30 PM on Wednesday, 19 September, 2007, at the proposed site on Old Drewsville Road.

Continued hearing:  7:30 PM on Wednesday, 19 September, 2007, the Board’s regular meeting time.****

Respectfully submitted,

Lucy Weber,

Secretary.

 

 

Ed. Note: Thanks to Regina Borden for these minutes of the Augsut 2 meeting.  CCB

TOWN OF WALPOLE

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SELECTMEN

AUGUST 2, 2007

Selectmen Present: Charles Miller, Whitney Aldrich, (Absent: Sheldon Sawyer)

Mr. Miller called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. with eight people present in the audience.

PUBLIC BUSINESS:

DELBERT FROST – Boundary Line Problem:  Delbert Frost presented a 1994 survey that was done by Mr. Lawrence and explained his boundary line problem.  The change to the boundary line went before the Planning Board on June 21, 1994, the abutters were present and it was mutually agreed to at that time.  The Board of Selectmen recommended that Mr. Frost obtain a copy of those minutes as they will be beneficial to him while attempting to resolve this matter.

BOY SCOUTS:  Josh Makinen, Walpole Boy Scout troop, noted that the Board of Selectmen had previously approved having them build a new closet in the downstairs of the Town Hall.  They obtained two estimates for the materials and Fall Mountain Building Supply was the lowest for approximately $200.00.  They would like to begin the project on Saturday.  Ronald Makinen said they will talk to Mark Houghton about doing the electrical work.          

Mr. Aldrich moved to accept the Fall Mountain Building Supply, Inc. estimate in the amount of $181.04 plus the purchase of miscellaneous items that will bring the total up to approximately $200.00 for the materials for building a new closet in the Town Hall.  Seconded by Mr. Miller.  All in favor, so voted. 

JEFF MILLER & PAM ASLINGER – 57 Main Street / Edward Jones:  Jeff Miller, Chairman of the Planning Board, referenced Building Permit No. 2007-029 for 57 Main Street that the Board of Selectmen previously discussed during their meetings on July 12th and July 26th and put on-hold; there was a question regarding the $10,000 renovation figure and it was forwarded to the Planning Board.  He explained that the tenant intends to do internal renovations only under Section 4 of the Site Plan Review regulations; there will be no change of use so it does not require a Building Permit.  This was his decision on a procedural issue that did not need to go before the Planning Board.  Pam Aslinger explained that the renovations are infrastructure improvements such as wiring, etc.; some of the $10,000 amount will be used for office furniture and equipment. 

Mr. Miller moved that no Building Permit will be required for 57 Main Street due to the renting of the building to Edward Jones.  A note should be made of this transaction and given to the Assessor.  Seconded by Mr. Aldrich.  All in favor, so voted.     

TODD PATCH:  Todd Patch lives on the Valley Road and explained some issues with his abutters.  One abutter appears to be doing some clear cutting of trees on 3-to-4 acres of land.  The Board of Selectmen felt if that much cutting is being done the Town should have been notified, therefore, they agreed that a letter will be written to the property owner and a Notice of Intent to Cut document will be enclosed.  Another abutter has 8-to-10 unregistered vehicles on their property that appear to have trash in them.       

Mr. Miller moved that the Board of Selectmen notify the Health Officer for a possible violation of the Health Ordinance at 258 Valley Road.  Seconded by Mr. Aldrich.  All in favor, so voted.

The Board of Selectmen will visit the same address to see if there are any illegal vehicles on the property in the owners’ possession.  

Board of Selectmen Meeting – August 2, 2007 – Page 2

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:  Mr. Aldrich moved to approve the Accounts Payable check register and manifest in the amount of $24,693.55.  Seconded by Mr. Miller.  All in favor, so voted.

PAYROLL:  Mr. Aldrich moved to approve the payroll voucher for the week ending July 28, 2007, for gross wages in the amount of $18,736.84 or net wages in the amount of $10,563.66.  Seconded by Mr. Miller.  All in favor, so voted.

Mr. Aldrich moved to approve the electronic fund transfer for the Withholding, MEDI and FICA taxes in the amount of $4,276.13.  Seconded by Mr. Miller.  All in favor, so voted.

Mr. Aldrich moved to approve the supplemental payroll voucher for the week ending July 28, 2007, for gross wages in the amount of $280.50 or net wages in the amount of $259.04.  Seconded by Mr. Miller.  All in favor, so voted.

Mr. Aldrich moved to approve the supplemental electronic fund transfer for the Withholding, MEDI and FICA taxes in the amount of $42.92.  Seconded by Mr. Miller.  All in favor, so voted.

MINUTES –SELECTMEN’S MEETING- JULY 26, 2007:  Mr. Aldrich moved to approve the Minutes of the public Board of Selectmen’s meeting of July 26, 2007, as printed.  Seconded by Mr. Miller.  All in favor, so voted.

BUILDING PERMITS:

RICHARD & PEGGY PSCHIRRER – MAP / LOT 004-050-000:  Mr. Miller moved to approve Building Permit No. 2007-030 for Richard and Peggy Pschirrer to construct a first floor bedroom addition on Wentworth Road.  Seconded by Mr. Aldrich.  All in favor, so voted.

BERNARD & ANN GAGNE – MAP / LOT 012-055-024:  Mr. Aldrich moved to approve Building Permit No. 2007-031 for Bernard & Ann Gagne to put in a prefab storage shed on their property on Dearborn Circle.  Seconded by Mr. Miller.  All in favor, so voted.

OLD BUSINESS:

DISCUSS THE COMMON / BANDSTAND RENTAL FEES (EXCLUDING THE VETERANS MEMORIAL):  Mr. Aldrich moved to pass-over this agenda item until a full board is present.  Seconded by Mr. Miller.  All in favor, so voted.

  TAX COLLECTOR STUDY GROUP ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING ON AUGUST 6TH:  Mr. Aldrich noted that letters were sent to the members of the Study Group for the organizational meeting on August 6th in the Town Hall. 

NEW BUSINESS:

POLICE DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY GRANT:  Mr. Aldrich moved that the Chairman be authorized to sign the Police Department application for the Highway Safety Grant.  Seconded by Mr. Miller.  All in favor, so voted.

LETTER FROM MARK HOUGHTON – 16 WESTMINSTER STREET:  The Board of Selectmen acknowledged receipt of a letter from Mark Houghton outlining the Water and Sewer Department services to the Old Griswold House, LLC at 16 Westminster Street.

Board of Selectmen Meeting – August 2, 2007 – Page 3

QUESTION FROM BARBARA O’BRIEN – 21 KILLEEN STREET:  Barbara O’Brien, Commissioner in the North Walpole Village, contacted the Health Officer regarding a violation in North Walpole.  She questioned who is responsible for the clean-up costs and if a lien can be placed on the property, if necessary.

Mr. Miller moved that the Board of Selectmen contact Barbara O’Brien about the report from the Health Officer.  Seconded by Mr. Aldrich.  All in favor, so voted.

Mr. Miller volunteered to contact Barbara O’Brien.

LOREN MARTIN OF AVITAR – ALTERNATE FOR CHESHIRE COUNTY-NH ASSESSORS ASSOCIATION:  Mr. Aldrich moved to pass-over this agenda item until a full board is present.  Seconded by Mr. Miller.  All in favor, so voted.

Mr. Aldrich moved to adjourn this meeting.  Seconded by Mr. Miller and, with all in favor, the motion was approved.  The time was 8:58 P.M.

Respectfully submitted,

Regina Borden, Recording Secretary

 

2nd Annual “Fore the Kids” Golf Tournament  Walpole, NH — August 15, 2007 — The Walpole Village School is holding the 2nd annual “Fore the Kids: Golf Tournament Sunday, August 26, 2007 12:30 PM at the Bellows Falls Country Club in Bellows Falls, VT.  Please join us for an 18 hole scramble, cart included, followed by a barbeque dinner at the school.  Family and friends are invited to join you.  There will be various contests, raffles and prizes.  All skill levels are welcome for this friendly competition.  Sign up as a single, couple or a foursome.  The cost is $100 per player.      If you have questions or are ready to sign up please call Ann at 603 399-7787 or email her at ann_or_mitch@yahoo.com.

PLANNING BOARD

TOWN OF WALPOLE, NH  03608

 

Walpole Planning Board Meeting            August 14, 2007   7:30pm   Town Hall

 

AGENDA

I.              Open Meeting

                A.  Roll Call - Designate Alternates                                             B.  Approve Minutes of July 10, 2007

II.                Review Applications Submitted:  ACCEPT-REJECT-DELAY PRIOR to Public Hearing

A.  UNH Sprint-Nextel Corp. - Site Plan Review for additional antennas to an existing telecommunications facility located at 88 Scovill Road Map 3 Lot 82 in the Timberland zone.  Purpose is to add 2 new antennas at the same centerline height of 280 ft. and one equipment cabinet inside the existing equipment shelter.  C Davis Associates, Jacqueline Murray presenting.

B.  Hubbard Farms LLC - Minor 2 lot Subdivision located on Rte. 12 North, Map 12 Lot 4 in the Commercial and Rural Agricultural zones.  Purpose is to create Lot 1 of 31.13 acres and Lot 2 of 12.48 acres.  Frontages, lot sizes and setbacks are met for the zone.  A 30 ft. ROW across Huntington Lane is being retained for Lot 1 access to back area.  Joe DiBernardo presenting.

C.  Martha Kingsbury - Minor 2 lot Subdivision located on Kingsbury Road, Map 8 Lot 118 in the Rural Agricultural zone.  Creates Lot 1 of 70.83 acres and Lot 2 of 1.30 acres.  Frontages, lot sizes and setbacks are met for the zone.  Virginia Foote, Lawrence Assoc. presenting.

D.  Sheldon Sawyer - Minor 4 lot Subdivision located on County, Wentworth and Meetinghouse Roads, Map 5 Lot 4 in the Rural Agricultural zone.  Purpose is to create Lot 1 of 5.62 acres, Lot 2 of 6.36 acres and Lot 3 of 5.02 acres and Lot 4 of 55.52 acres remaining.  Frontages, lot sizes and setbacks are met for the zone.  Virginia Foote presenting.

E.  Steven Flessa, Barbara LaRoche/John McKee Pratt Revocable Trust - Minor 2 lot Subdivision located on Reservoir Road, Map 11, Lot 1 in the Rural Agricultural zone.   Purpose is to create Lot 1 of 42.09 acres and Lot 2 of 41.24 acres.  Frontages, lot sizes and setbacks are met for the zone.  Joe DiBernardo presenting.

F.  Richard S. Francis III - Minor 2 lot Subdivision located on Ramsay Hill Rd. in the Rural Agricultural zone, Map 11, Lot 7-1-1.  Purpose is to create Lot 1 of 57 acres and Lot 2 of 3.1 acres.  Frontages, lot sizes and setbacks are met for the zone.  Joe DiBernardo presenting.

III.           Close Meeting/Open Public Hearing

                A.  UNH Sprint- Nextel                                                        D.  Sheldon Sawyer

                B.  Hubbard Farms                                                     E.  Flessa, LaRoche, Pratt

                C.  Martha Kingsbury, Pratt                                   F.   Richard S. Francis III

IV.           Close Public Hearing/Re-open Meeting - Action on Applications Submitted:  Approve/Disapprove/Delay

                A - F as shown above

V.                Unfinished Business

                A.  1834 “Griswold Place” - Site Plan Review - pending revision - Red Smith presenting

                B.  Walpole D & D, LLC - Major 8 lot subdivision - review regarding Water Study,

                Brian Goetz presenting

                C.  Site Plan Review Revocation North Meadow Plaza - Hockensmith comment, invoice

VI.           New Business:  Preliminary Conceptual Consultations

                A.  Richard Drew surveyor, Hearns Lot Line Adjustment on Church St.

                B.  Chamberlain Machine - Special Exception recommendation, Site Plan Review, Chris Miller

                C.  Jack Franks Surveyor - Minor 2 lot subdivision Ramsay Hill Rd. Map 8 Lot 86

                D.  Joe DiBernardo surveyor - Two Minor 2 lot subdivisions Barnett Hill, Chris Monahan

VII.                Communications and Miscellaneous

                A.  Review items for work session 8/28/07

                B.  Other

VIII.                Adjourn Meeting

 

 

 

 

 

TOWN OF WALPOLE

MEETING OF THE BOARD OF SELECTMEN

JULY 19, 2007

Selectmen Present:            Charles Miller, Sheldon Sawyer, Whitney Aldrich

 

Mr. Miller called the meeting to order at 7:25 P.M. with six people present in the audience.

 

PUBLIC BUSINESS:

PERSONNEL:  Mr. Aldrich moved to enter into a Non-Public Session pursuant to RSA 91-A:3 II to discuss (a) Personnel.  Seconded by Mr. Sawyer and, on a roll call vote with all in favor, the motion was approved.  The time was 7:26 P.M.

 

The regular meeting resumed at 7:45 P.M.

 

SANDRA SMITH – LETTER TO BOARD OF SELECTMEN:  Mr. Sawyer moved to enter into a Non-Public Session pursuant to RSA 91-A:3 II to discuss (a) Personnel.  Seconded by Mr. Aldrich, on a roll call vote with all in favor, the motion was approved.  The time was 7:48 PM.

 

The regular meeting resumed at 8:14 P.M.

 

KEITH THIBAULT AND TED BENSON – REF: VALLEY ROAD LAND:  Keith Thibault, Ted Benson and Eileen Swain brought the Board of Selectmen up-to-date on their gathering of information and talked about options on the Town-owned Valley Road land.  Reference was made to previous articles that were voted upon and are usually referred to as “boilerplate articles” because each contains the language “authorizing indefinitely, until specific recession of such authority”.  These articles were voted upon prior to 1997 but also appear in the 1997 Annual Town Report.     

Mr. Sawyer moved that the Board of Selectmen inform the Town Attorney, Jeremy Hockinsmith, that one of the above boilerplate articles, No. 6 in the 1997 Annual Town Report, references “Transfer of Tax Liens and Sale of Tax Deed Property” and had been duly voted on by the Town voters.  Seconded by Mr. Aldrich.  All in favor, so voted.  

 

Mr. Sawyer moved to give permission to the parties involved to continue working on this project.  A letter of this confirmation will be forwarded to the Southwestern Community Service, Attorney Jeremy Hockinsmith, Attorney Gary Kinyon, Ted Benson and Eileen Swain.  Seconded by Mr. Aldrich.  All in favor, so voted.

 

ACCOUNTS PAYABLE:  Mr. Sawyer moved to approve the Accounts Payable check register and manifest in the amount of $61,570.95.  Seconded by Mr. Aldrich.  All in favor, so voted.

 

PAYROLL:  Mr. Aldrich moved to approve the payroll voucher for the week ending July 14, 2007, for gross wages in the amount of $19,073.22 or net wages in the amount of $10,958.56.  Seconded by Mr. Sawyer.  All in favor, so voted.

 

Mr. Aldrich moved to approve the electronic fund transfer for the Withholding, MEDI and FICA taxes in the amount of $4,290.96.  Seconded by Mr. Sawyer.  All in favor, so voted.

 

 

Board of Selectmen Meeting – July 19, 2007 – Page 2

 

 

DEPARTMENT / COMMITTEE REPORTS:

The Board of Selectmen received and reviewed Minutes of the following meetings:  1) North Walpole Village Board of Commissioners – July 17, 2007; 2) Planning Board – July 10, 2007; and 3) Trustees of Trust Funds – July 13, 2007.

 

MINUTES –SELECTMEN’S MEETING- JULY 12, 2007:  Mr. Aldrich moved to approve the Minutes of the public Board of Selectmen’s meeting of July 12, 2007, as printed.  Seconded by Mr. Sawyer.  All in favor, so voted.

 

BUILDING PERMIT:

DAVID AND JUNE ANN BOUDRIEAU – MAP 018-004-000:  Mr. Aldrich moved to approve Building Permit No. 2007-029 for David and June Ann Boudrieau to construct a one-and-a-half story modular cape with garage / workshop on the Capron Road.  Seconded by Mr. Miller.  All in favor, so voted.

 

OLD BUSINESS:

NRCS AMENDMENT NO. 4:  Mr. Sawyer moved that the Chairman be authorized to sign Amendment No. 4 to the Project Agreement for DRS #48 – Main Street project.  Seconded by Mr. Aldrich.  All in favor, so voted.

 

BUDGET ITEMS:  The Board of Selectmen and Elaine Moore reviewed several budget items including the miscellaneous accounts.  It was agreed that Mr. Sawyer will talk to Rick Cooper, Mr. Aldrich will talk to Jim Terrell and Mr. Miller will talk to Police Chief Hewes.

 

PRE-BUY FUEL:  There was discussion relative to the pre-buy of fuel for the coming heating season.  The Board of Selectmen compared the 2006 figures against the 2007 usage figures to-date for the Town Hall.  Elaine Moore will continue to do research.  This will be an agenda item for the next meeting.     

 

SALE OF LAND (MAIN STREET):  There was a consensus of the Board of Selectmen that a Town vote will be taken in March 2008 to sell the parcel of property off Main Street known as the old Town jail property.

 

NEW BUSINESS:

MISSING ITEMS AT THE TOWN HALL:  Elaine Moore advised that several items are missing from the Town Hall over a period of time.  The most recent item is the big coffee urn that the Grange gave to the Town Hall.  Mr. Sawyer felt they have to be more diligent in checking the areas and items used the morning following events in the Town Hall.     

 

VACATION TIME – ELAINE MOORE:  Mr. Sawyer moved to approve the following vacation time for Elaine Moore:  1) July 25 and 26, 2007, only in the mornings; 2) July 30th to August 2nd, 2007, all day; and 3) August 27th to September 3rd, 2007, all day.  Seconded by Mr. Aldrich.  All in favor, so voted.

 

CEMETERY DEED – JOSEPHINE LEONARD:  Mr. Sawyer moved to approve the Cemetery Deed for plot No. D-500 for Josephine Leonard.  Seconded by Mr. Aldrich.  All in favor, so voted. 

 

 

Board of Selectmen Meeting – July 19, 2007 – Page 3

 

 

ALTERNATES ON PLANNING AND ZONING BOARDS:  The Board of Selectmen discussed a recent article that appeared in the New Hampshire Town and City magazine regarding the legal requirements for Alternates on the Planning and Zoning Boards.  Copies of the article were sent to both the Walpole Planning and Zoning Boards.

 

DAM ARTICLES:  Copies of several newspaper articles regarding the dam assessment in the Town of Rockingham / Village of Bellows Falls were sent to the Town of Walpole’s assessor.

 

HEALTH INSURANCE:  Mrs. Russell had previously explained a miscommunication on the effective date when a family status change was being made to their health insurance coverage.  

Mr. Sawyer moved to authorize reimbursement in the amount of $220.00 to Bruce and Theresa Russell.  Seconded by Mr. Aldrich.  All in favor, so voted. 

 

GENERATOR:  Mr. Miller was contacted by a property owner who complained about the noise from a neighborhood generator and wanted to know if the Board of Selectmen could do something about it.  There was a consensus of the Board of Selectmen that the Town does not have a Noise Ordinance but they suggested that the property owner can check the decibel level and look into the State law.

 

LETTERS TO BE SIGNED:

TOM RONNING – REF: STUDY COMMITTEE (One Tax Collector for Walpole and North Walpole):  Mr. Aldrich moved to approve and sign the letter to Tom Ronning.  Seconded by Mr. Sawyer.  All in favor, so voted.

 

BRUCE MARTIN – REF: VETERANS MEMORIAL:  Mr. Sawyer moved to approve and sign the letter to Bruce Martin regarding the Veterans Memorial.  Seconded by Mr. Aldrich.  All in favor, so voted.

Mr. Sawyer moved to adjourn this meeting.  Seconded by Mr. Aldrich and, with all in favor, the motion was approved.  The time was 10:16 P.M.

Respectfully submitted,

Regina Borden, Recording Secretary

  

 

 

Cruise Night At The Real Twist

The Real Twist Ice Cream stand in Walpole, NH  will hold its next Classic Car Cruise Night on Sunday, August 12thth, from 6-9PM. Here’s a chance for the whole family to enjoy a Sunday evening looking at old and antique cars, while enjoying pizza, hot dogs and ice cream. There will be live music by Vinnie Dibernardo. Anyone who brings his classic car to show will get a free regular sized sundae. Everyone visiting can get free jimmies, diptop or flavorburst with any cup or cone. Make sure to enter the drawing for free Pizza, ice cream or DVD’s!

 The Real Twist is located next to Real to Reel Video at the North Meadow Plaza in Walpole. It is open noon – 9PM, seven days a week. Enjoy your ice cream outside, in the lovely garden, or under the porch.

  The final Cruise Night of the  2007 Season is scheduled for  September 2nd. See you