28 June 2006
 
Opinion: Wait a Minute, Mr. Sawyer! The Town's Involved In This Too!
Post a comment (login required)

Our Planning Board on June 13, by a 5-0 vote, concluded that the town’s zoning ordinance means that no new commercial building that exceeds 40,000 square feet may be approved in Walpole.  It rejected the interpretation that any size building could be acceptable so long as businesses—or “establishments” as the ordinance calls them—do not exceed 40,000 square feet.

Despite the vote’s settling a long-pending issue, Walpole State Representative, Selectman and Planning Board Liaison Sheldon Sawyer was quoted last week in the Keene Sentinel as saying, “It was my own personal understanding that this [zoning ordinance] referred to a limitation from an establishment such as Wal-Mart.  It never mentions ‘building’.”

Sawyer continued, “I’m a strong believer in both property rights and the right of private enterprise.  They have the market research.  They’ve determined what size store they think they can put in and make a profit…That’s why we originally had zoning set up that way.  It allowed private enterprise to do what they think they can do under the current regulations.”

Well, let’s think about that…

In the first place our zoning ordinance does specifically name “a building” as the subject of the clause the Board interpreted last week. See the relevant text of the zoning ordinance set out at the end of this editorial.

Second, while Mr. Sawyer may be willing to allow private enterprise “to do what they think they can do under the current regulations”, I’m not.  And I don’t think the town is either. That’s why the town set up the Planning Board and the Zoning Board to study major development applications and to apply the regulations in the first place.

Walpole needs development and developers to bring needed growth in housing and commercial activity.  Still, someone needs to represent the values, wants and needs of the townspeople when proposals are made and not to assume, ahead of time, that developers will consider those values, wants and needs. There may be many businesses whose market research might suggest building in Walpole but whose implications for the town, whether in traffic attracted, in waste materials or noise created or in out-of-scale ugliness, we would not want.  We rely on the Planning Board enforcing our ordinances to keep out those kinds of adverse growth.

The better answer, I suggest to Mr. Sawyer, is not carte blanche for developers but rather communication and collaboration between our town government, our citizens and those who wish to build here to see that everyone’s interests are respected and balanced and to see that the goals of our Master Plan and the words and spirit of our zoning ordinances are applied. 

Personally, I hope Berkshire Development returns to Walpole with an attractive, creative and profitable plan that can serve the growing commercial needs of the town while respecting the town’s values and regulations.  And I hope that Mr. Sawyer will respect the actual language and goals of our laws and not simply stand aside to allow developers “to do what they think they can do.”     

We’ve seen in many other communities what happens when developers are allowed “do what they think they can do.”   Walpole has protected something quite special here to date, and the Planning Board’s recent decision was a very positive step for our future.  Let’s continue to be vigilant about the dimensions and nature of our growth.               

                       *                                             *                                             *

The official town website at www.walpolenh.us sets out the complete zoning and site plan ordinances.  The relevant part of Article VI, Section B Permitted Uses of the zoning ordinance reads as follows:

Uses Permitted: 

A building may be erected, altered or used and a lot may be used or occupied only for the following purposes and in accordance with the following provisions: 

  1. Any use permitted in Residential District Type B under the same provisions as apply to residences in said district.

2.   Lodging houses, hotels, motels, inns and tourist cabins including such retail businesses       within these buildings as is conducted for the convenience of the guests herein. 

3.   Shops, restaurants and other retail establishments not exceeding 40,000 square feet in gross floor area. 

4.   Theaters, halls, clubs and amusement centers. 

5.   Greenhouses and florist shops. 

6.   Undertaking establishments. 

7.   Business and professional offices and banks.

 

Posted by Chuck Bingaman at 1:47 AM | Comments (3)
 
Subscription Options

You are not logged in, so your subscription status for this entry is unknown. You can login or register here.

Re: Opinion: Wait a Minute, Mr. Sawyer! The Town's Involved In This Too!
One other comment about the sloppy ordinance. Zoning ordinances are supposed to have a section on definitions for the key words in the ordinance. So does ours. "Building" is defined. There is no definiton for "establishment". If you look in the Oxford English Dictionary there are several definitons and several of them could apply. "Business" is only one of those. It could refer as well to a building or the entire development. Since it is not defined in the ordinance I dont see how one can decide on it's meaning without looking at the context and that would include the intent of the original ordinance and the master plan. I think that is what the Planning Board did.

Posted by melschupack on June 28, 2006 at 6:46 AM

Re: Opinion: Wait a Minute, Mr. Sawyer! The Town's Involved In This Too!
Having recently come from the cauldron that is Boston city politics, I marvel at this grass routes effort to honor and preserve a town's heritage and personality. When I read comments and oponions like this one, which responds to the issue of the ongoing struggle of the Planning Board, I am reminded that, indeed, all politics are local--and rightfully so. I appreciate your thoughtful yet critical eye, and the clarity with which you express your take on this crucial situation--and all of the issues you bring to our attention in the Walpolean. Thanks, Pam Bernard

Posted by pambernard on June 28, 2006 at 6:56 AM

Re: Opinion: Wait a Minute, Mr. Sawyer! The Town's Involved In This Too!
First I feel that Berkshire has been very upfront as to what they want to do and have made many concessions to accomodate those set against any development in Walpole. By saying they should return with an "attractive, Creative and profitable plan" could be interpreted to mean, a plan that the Walpole Tomorrow group wants. Which I interpret as no plan at all! Secondly it appears that there are those whose will interpret the word "establishment" and/or "building" to mean what they want it to mean to satisfy THEIR goals and not necessarily the goals of the Town or the original writers of the Master Plan or Zoning ordinances. I still think Walpole TOmorrow backers should buy all the land in question and bulldoze is under and make a park. Bill Moses

Posted by bill on June 28, 2006 at 1:48 PM

Post a comment (login required)