24 March 2006
 
"Big Box" Stores and Issues They Raise
Post a comment (login required)

[Note: Registered Walpolean subscriber Barbara O’Connor sent me the recent extensive report of the “Big Box” Sub-Committee of the Brattleboro Planning Commission to share with Walpolean readers.  I have excerpted it below to make its size manageable.  (I could email you the whole thing if you request it.)  The building proposed by Berkshire Development for Walpole is 68,400 square feet.  The largest store in it will not exceed 40,000 square feet, and the other three or four stores in the building will be considerably smaller.  CCB]

A Big Box Store is defined for our purposes as a retail establishment greater than 50,000 square feet in floor area. There is currently just one retail store in Brattleboro greater than 50,000 square feet, the Home Depot on Putney Road, comprising a footprint of 61,000 square feet. Although the 50,000 square foot threshold is by its nature somewhat arbitrary, numerous communities around the country have imposed caps on retail stores greater than 50,000 square feet, and a bill proposed in the Vermont legislature selects the same size threshold….

There is an extensive body of academic and other literature on Big Box Stores, which overwhelmingly demonstrates the overall adverse impact of large-format retail establishments on local economies and municipalities. Aside from studies paid for by Wal-Mart, the subcommittee was unable, despite significant research, to find a single independent study refuting these negative impacts….

One study concluded that big box retail generates a net annual revenue deficit of $468 per 1,000 square feet. The main factors were higher road maintenance costs and greater demand for public safety services. For example, the City of Pineville, North Carolina had to raise taxes to subsidize police calls primarily associated with big box stores, and in East Lampeter, Pennsylvania, crimes generated at a Wal-Mart accounted for one-fourth of the town’s non-traffic citations, criminal misdemeanors and felony complaints. Closer to home, planning board members and the police chief in Epping, New Hampshire complained last year about the cost and burden on the town’s small police force of responding to more than 250 calls that year for incidents at a 203,000 square foot Wal-Mart, mostly theft, accidents, and check fraud….[CCB Comment: It was suggested at the last Walpole Planning Board meeting and afterward as well that specific study be made on what demands for additional public services that additional stores such as Berkshire proposes might raise. I do not know whether anyone is looking into this issue.]

Locally owned stores contribute much more to the local economy than national chains. One independent study based on Chicago stores concluded that locally owned businesses contribute 70 percent more to local economies than national chains. This is because local businesses use local services such as banks, printers, accountants and newspaper advertising, unlike national big box stores. In addition, locally owned stores usually feature more locally produced products than big box stores with established supply systems, which helps the local and state economy….

Expanding the scope of DRB Review of Big Box Stores would send a pro-business message. One consistent criticism of capping the size of Big Box Stores is the perception that doing so sends an anti-business message which will hurt Brattleboro by driving away businesses that want to come here. This perception is one reason the subcommittee recommends expanding DRB review of applications for stores greater than 50,000 square feet, rather than an outright cap. The Subcommittee believes that the reasonable requirements set forth in the proposed Ordinance constitute a pro-business measure. The Ordinance allows the DRB to limit the establishment of vast stores that it finds, on a case-by-case basis, would adversely affect the town’s economy and character. The result is a pro-business climate not just for large stores that it finds will benefit the town, but also for more local, independent businesses that are the hallmark of a thriving community….

Posted by Chuck Bingaman at 7:44 PM | Comments (8)
 
Subscription Options

You are not logged in, so your subscription status for this entry is unknown. You can login or register here.

Re: "Big Box" Stores and Issues They Raise
The proposed larger building proposed by Berkshire Development is 70,087 s.f., not 68,400 s.f. mentioned above. The studies about the impacts, mentioned above, are called Cost of Community Service Studies (COCS studies) and some can be found by doing a Google search for them. The negative impacts do show up in those I'v seen.

Posted by melschupack on March 24, 2006 at 8:22 PM

Re: "Big Box" Stores and Issues They Raise
Wow, Walpole Tomorrow is now really grasping at straws. A lot of time was wasted reproducing a study that is totally irrelevant to the proposed new Walpole shopping center. Re-read your first paragraph. The new Walpole center doesn't meet your "big box" store criteria. The building will be 70,000 square feet but the biggest store won't exceed 40,000 square ft. with two smaller stores to make up the rest. Not one of these stores meet "big box" square foot number of 50000 square feet. The vote is over, the people have spoken. Let's now work with Berkshire to get the best shopping center for our community, one that is eye pleasing and meets the needs and wants of this town.

Posted by ldevault on March 25, 2006 at 10:12 AM

Re: "Big Box" Stores and Issues They Raise
I would be more impressed by studies of towns/cities in NH similiar to Walpole,(small Village with commercial zone a mile away from Village) that has installed a building of 68 to 70,000 sf with one store of 40,000 sf. NC,IND and Chicago stats do not impress this poor native boy. I am sure for the right price Berkshire and their backers and plaza owners would sell out. Then the plaza could be bull dozed under, and a park made and then given to the State. Maybe WT should think about that! William Moses, signed for those who object to just, bill.

Posted by bill on March 25, 2006 at 11:26 AM

Re: "Big Box" Stores and Issues They Raise
Another thought or rather a question that no one has brought up to my knowledge. How many SF is the Pinnacleview building, Rite-Aid, Fall Mtn Supply and the Johnson building soon to be Burdicks or Mr G's in North Walpole. Just curious. William Moses

Posted by bill on March 25, 2006 at 2:42 PM

Re: "Big Box" Stores and Issues They Raise
Good points Bill. What you have here is fringe group using scare tactics. It sounds like they have the time and money to travel elsewhere to shop. Maybe they should contact the City of Keene and see how bad the area has gone down since the Home Depot complex went in. Use some relevant data in their argument. If you ask the working family and some seniors this complex will only be a benefit to this community.

Posted by ldevault on March 27, 2006 at 8:27 PM

Re: "Big Box" Stores and Issues They Raise
The Berkshire building will be about 1.6 acres in size( 43,560 sf = one acre ) .To put it in perspective : the average of Pinnacleview , Rite Aid , etc would be around 12,000sf ( I have'nt measured , but 12,000 seems like a nice figure + or - a 1'000sf or so ) . So the Berkshire building would be about 4 / 6 times the size of any building presently in Walpole . Take a walk down to the town common ,stand at one end . look down to the other end , visualize a 20 foot wall around what you are looking at and add 50% to what you visualize . That is what will be big box on the corner of Rte . 12 and the now 123 turn off . Merv Stevens

Posted by betmerv on March 30, 2006 at 6:00 PM

Re: "Big Box" Stores and Issues They Raise
I hesitate to question Mr. Stevens yard stick but isn't Shaws 25,000 sf presently? Pinnacleview certainly, from the untrained eye, looks much larger as does Rite Aid. What about the Food Discount Store in NW or LaValleys or doesn't North Walpole count. What about Fall Mtn Building Supply. No one wants to put a store on the Common or in the Village of Walpole. Berkshire's people want to build in a commercial zone that the residents of Walpole wanted developed at one time. Regardless of all the comments, the vote is in and it is time to move forward. Is it any wonder that Hubbard Farms can not find buyers for the closed farm on Route 12. Who would be foolish enough to spend their money on that land when it is obvious that the good citizens of Walpole would not allow it to be developed. Let me preface this next statement by saying I am happy to see Burdicks moving into the old RN Johnson Small Machine building. But doesn't it seem contradictory that the Burdicks began renovations and continue to prepare the building prior to receiving all the permits from the Town? Just a thought! William H. Moses

Posted by bill on March 30, 2006 at 6:20 PM

Re: "Big Box" Stores and Issues They Raise
My applause to William Moses regarding his commentary about the LA Burdick construction. This is not the first time, or perhaps the last, this has happened, yet it is continually allowed. Might i remind everyone the entire LA Burdick establishment does not allow for ADA entrance in the Walpole Grocery, nor the cafe due to the obstruction on the walkway. I use Burdicks as a reference, and do not mean to selectively raise them as an example, however these smaller establishments, in addition to the issue the shopping plaza raises, should illustrate the need for a code official in town, opposed to boards being forced to understand the complexities of the zoning requirements in addition to building code issues. On a final note, I have been deeply amused by the ravings of other business individuals in town, who have established their slot on the "walpole quaintness" but object to further developement in a already existing plaza. Heck perhaps Berkshire developement will even place signage expressing their opinion of govermental practices in front of the plaza for the world to see. Frank Balla

Posted by balla123 on March 31, 2006 at 7:04 AM

Post a comment (login required)